Search for: "People v. Fields"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 4,897
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2022, 11:02 am
ASTM, for example, has developed more than 12,000 standards used in fields ranging from consumer products to construction to medical services and devices. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 12:45 pm
Whiting v. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 6:25 am
See pp. 8-11 of the opinion, Doe v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 1:08 pm
In 2014, the Supreme Court decided the landmark Alice v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 5:01 am
A recent case, Co v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 7:18 am
PatCon V will be April 10-11 at Kansas.Here are some other large academic conferences that often have IP-specific panels or significant overlap with folks interested in IP. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 7:06 am
Calling the blocks "ineffectual", the court also stated that the blockades "constitute an infringement of [people's] freedom to act at their discretion". [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 1:52 am
Managing Intellectual Property magazine is compiling its annual list of the 50 most influential people in the field of intellectual property this year. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:30 pm
” The United States Supreme Court recently tried to clarify the meaning of this law in the case Elonis v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 10:42 am
Our clients are “people” and not “cases” or “files. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 2:33 pm
Judge Kara Stoll agreed explaining that at certain points in her career she had to make decisions about what path she wanted to pursue - litigation v prosecution, district v appellate work - and that required active decision making. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 11:53 am
London: Bradbury and Evans, 1854-1872, 25 v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 11:43 am
This is likely to be welcomed as most people had struggled to interpret the Judge's one set of terms position in a way which fitted in with commercial arms' length negotiations of complex licences. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 2:38 pm
In today’s case (Chapman v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:09 am
The Children’s Rights Alliance for England (CRAE) v Secretary of State for Justice and G4S Care and Justice Services (UK) Ltd and Serco plc [2012] EWHC 8 (Admin) – read judgment Although certain restraining measures had been taken unlawfully against young people in secure training centres for a number of years, the court had no jurisdiction to grant an order that the victims of this activity be identified and advised of their rights. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 9:54 am
GottaLaff is spinning this as the Secret Service being EXTREMELY grateful, like she’s going to have her picture up at the local field office next week and the SSA is going to send her an FTD “special fr [read post]
2 May 2016, 11:26 am
The Court’s agreement to rule on the SCA Hygiene Products case makes that something of a sequel in the patent field to a 2014 ruling by the Justices on copyright law — the six-to-three ruling in Petrella v. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 8:33 am
She also stresses the capaciousness of the statutory language, arguing, for example, that “discrimination” is often understood by both courts and the general public to include forcing people to compete on an uneven playing field. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:50 pm
In 1993, the California Supreme Court, in People v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 10:38 am
Co. v. [read post]
