Search for: "People v. House"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 11,351
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2023, 12:41 pm
" And in Trump v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 1:35 pm
Now depending how the Orange County District Attorney files this case, according to attorney Guisti, if the suspect is charged and convicted of both assault and battery he would only be punished for one crime, because the courts ruled in People v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 7:22 am
In the recent case of People v. [read post]
5 May 2025, 11:34 am
Mohamed v LB Hounslow. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 11:54 am
In the summer of 2021, the White House and Joe Biden were in the middle of a major factual faceplant. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 12:58 pm
R (Gebremarium) v City of Westminster [2009] EWHC 2254 (Admin) Thanks to the Garden Court housing bulletin for pointing to this one. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am
The landowner's actions relying on a valid permit must be so substantial that the municipal action results in serious loss rendering the improvements essentially valueless" (Town of Orangetown v Magee, 88 NY2d at 47-48; see Glacial Aggregates LLC v Town of Yorkshire, 14 NY3d at 136; People v Miller, 304 NY at 109; Matter of RC Enters. v Town of Patterson, 42 AD3d at 544; People ex rel. [read post]
22 May 2025, 9:00 pm
SUS assists people in finding housing and provides mental health support. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 4:05 am
In addition, while many of the houses of worship in Roman Catholic Diocese could seat well over 500 people, they were subject to attendance caps of ten or twenty-five persons, while retail businesses were not.... [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 4:51 pm
The case is Lewis v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 1:28 pm
Lalani v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 2:03 pm
Official White House Photo by Pete SouzaUnderstanding Olmstead requires a basic understanding of the Medicaid waiver system. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:56 pm
Just in case you're wondering what age we're talking about when people go over to their friend's house and then "hang out" at 1:00 a.m.]Sometime around 3:00 a.m., the six friends decided it would be fun to go “ghost hunting” . . . [read post]
18 May 2009, 9:53 am
Iqbal v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 9:32 am
It applied the principles laid down by the House of Lords in the case of Tomlinson v Congleton DC [2004] AC 46 in interpreting the 1957 Act. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:00 am
Instead of dealing with that issue (which appears to have been around whether two people between 18 and 21 had been looked after by the council previously under the CA, when accommodation had been provided under Part 7, Housing Act 1996), the Court of Appeal decided the claim on a preliminary issue. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:00 am
Instead of dealing with that issue (which appears to have been around whether two people between 18 and 21 had been looked after by the council previously under the CA, when accommodation had been provided under Part 7, Housing Act 1996), the Court of Appeal decided the claim on a preliminary issue. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 7:25 am
In State v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 6:31 am
(Powell v. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 4:05 pm
The Explanatory Notes refer to Thornton (cited above) and Jameel v The Wall Street Journal Europe Sprl [2003] EWCA Civ 1694. [read post]
