Search for: "People v. Paul" Results 1601 - 1620 of 3,002
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
THE
2 Dec 2009, 3:35 pm by CAPTAIN
A high court majority rejected Johnson's application for a stay of execution and his petition for review in which he raised the Eighth Amendment challenge.Justice John Paul Stevens, joined by Justice Stephen Breyer, dissented, saying Johnson’s situation was “as compelling a case” as he had encountered raising the constitutional concerns that Stevens himself raised in a 1995 dissent from another denial of certiorari: Lackey v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 7:13 am by Mark S. Humphreys
In 2007, Oleksy went snowmobiling in New York with his friend Paul Pochron and several other people. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 1:10 am
"  Panelists include: Nan Hunter, Paul Smith, Joseph Guerra, H. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 9:38 am by Jeff Gamso
  He may be crazy, but legal crazy is something different.Of course, some people think the legal standards are just fine. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 3:41 pm by Danny Jacobs
“It’s a massive undertaking that we’re trying to comply with,” DeWolfe said of the Court of Appeals’ Jan. 4 ruling in DeWolfe v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:06 am by Joe Consumer
Supreme Court in a 5-4 decision, AT&T Mobility LLC. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 3:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
 The IEEE has gone as far as to suggest that the recent Supreme Court decision in Stanford v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 8:09 pm
On July 29, the Missouri Court of Appeals for the Western District upheld the verdict in Johnson, et al. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 7:24 am by Steve Hall
As Justice John Paul Stevens wrote in Baze v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 4:50 am
Frank Spisak Jr. was convicted of murdering three people at Cleveland State University in 1983. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 10:05 pm by Jeffrey Richardson
Tex. 12/11/08)) and (2) the "distinguished" case is simply one holding that the result is different under Mississippi law (Paul v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 8:13 am by Marci Hamilton
Civil rights groups – including the ACLU, Americans United for Separation of Church and State, and People for the American Way – that initially supported RFRA have split off and now actively oppose it. [read post]