Search for: "People v. Polite"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 13,769
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2023, 1:50 pm
All 298 people on board perished, including 193 Dutch citizens. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
For Strauss, we were graced by a “common law constitution” that enabled sagacious judges in effect to update the Constitution as necessary; Ackerman, on the other hand, created an elaborate theory by which amendment outside the barriers established by Article V was legitimate precisely because proponents could capture the various institutions of American politics that would then be responsive to desires for reform. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 5:44 am
” People v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 11:44 pm
Michetti v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 1:15 pm
And few understand that better than the people bringing the lawsuit seeking to prevent them from getting it. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
Abraham Lincoln hated slavery but declared throughout his political career that he would return people escaping slavery to their putative masters. [read post]
Progressives Still Have Nothing Against Originalism - The American Spectator | USA News and Politics
25 Jan 2023, 6:45 am
” But one need not speculate — originalists consistently support the result in Brown; in Rutan v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 5:59 am
These are the folks who would want to roll back segregation, for whom Loving v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 9:52 am
Both parties see political gold in attacking the Internet. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
Heller and continued in McDonald v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
This is because the relative lack of amendments stems not so much from the cumbersome mechanics of Article V, but from a conscious political choice to avoid amendments unless absolutely necessary, a choice first made early in American history and remade again and again. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 4:37 am
Certainly the political expectation is that any detected illegal content will be removed. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 2:16 pm
In June 2022, Dobbs v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 7:30 am
Their images should be treated with the same scorn as those depicting Chief Justice Roger Taney, the author of the execrable decision in Dred Scott v. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 6:59 pm
” Slip op. at 62 (quoting from Gerber v. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 4:35 pm
On the same day, judgment was handed down in Piepenbrock v London School of Economics and Political Science & Ors [2023] EWHC 52 (KB) by Heather Williams J. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 3:30 am
In brief, if you use social media you should: adopt a social media policy so that you have internal controls in place that are appropriate, proportionate and are clear to everyone at the charity using social media; ensure that you use social media only to help you achieve your charity’s purpose and in a way that is in your charity’s best interests; comply with relevant laws and regulations; ensure that any campaigning or political activity that you do on social media… [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
That contestation and transformation is a basic fact of democracy, sometimes known to political theorists as the "boundary problem"—every democratic state's decisions affect more people than are included within the ambit of its demos (where, for constitutional purposes, we can understand that demos as described in concentric circles representing degrees of inclusion in matters such as political rights, liberal civil rights, etc.), and hence the… [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 6:04 am
For example, last summer, the California Supreme Court ruled in an employment lawsuit of Grande v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 5:16 am
And in the Flatow case, known as Flatow v. [read post]
