Search for: "Powers v. Powers"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 55,689
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2014, 2:18 pm
On December 8, 2014, the Supreme Court heard oral argument inDepartment of Transportation v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 11:19 am
On November 3, 2014, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 4:00 pm
Cable Connection, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 12:29 pm
The most iconic case about presidential war power, Youngstown Sheet & Tube v. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 5:30 am
Here is the opinion in Standing Bear v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 1:16 pm
Over one year ago, our colleague Chris Hart argued that the District of New Jersey court’s decision in FTC v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 6:31 am
This is the first appellate case after U.S. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 12:14 pm
Carlos Manuel Vázquez (Georgetown Univ. - Law) has posted Missouri v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 3:57 pm
Both Michigan v. [read post]
18 Jan 2009, 3:15 pm
Despite being overruled at the trial and appellate courts, Ford has taken its appeal to the Texas Supreme Court and a decision in Ford v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 7:53 am
Veterans v. [read post]
2 May 2007, 10:45 pm
The Treasuer and the Attorney-General have announced that the Government will apply to the High Court for special leave to appeal the decision of the Full Federal Court in APL v Alinta. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm
But at least it compensated Bentley Clothing and its lawyers for having to extend themselves in defending an unjust and unjustifiable litigation power play The post Bentley v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 8:39 pm
"Yulia V. [read post]
7 Jul 2018, 6:06 am
People's United Bank, NA v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:16 am
Term Limits v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:16 am
Term Limits v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 2:43 pm
In Power Integrations, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 7:19 pm
Read the decision at: NB Power et al. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 3:19 am
Al Rawi and others (Respondents) (Respondents) v The Security Service and others (Appellants) [2011] UKSC 34 – read judgment; read press summary At the centre of this appeal was the court’s power to order a “closed material procedure” for the whole or part of the trial of a civil claim for damages. [read post]
