Search for: "Price v. United States" Results 1601 - 1620 of 5,300
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2011, 7:49 am
Summary of presentation: On Tuesday, April 19, 2011, the United States Supreme Court heard arguments in American Electric Power, et al v Connecticut, et al (10-174) ("AEP"), a case filed by eight states, one city and three land trusts seeking an order requiring five of the nation's largest coal-fired power producers to reduce their emissions for at least a decade. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 6:52 am
Clement filed an amicus brief with the United States Supreme Court siding with non-issuer defendants in a securities class action case. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 12:58 pm by Trevor Cutaiar
  The United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals recently dealt with some of these new considerations in One Beacon Insurance Co. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 6:13 pm
DVSS brought a motion in the district court to dismiss Bamberg's claims on the grounds that, because Bamberg did not obtain its products directly from J & J, it lacked standing to pursue antitrust claims based on the United States Supreme Court's decision in Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2019, 9:33 am by Florian Mueller
But the particular way in which Qualcomm's reply brief makes that point is misleading:"See United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 3:55 pm
BennettHeld: On an appeal from the Secretary of the US Department of Agriculture (“USDA”), the United States District Court for the District of Maryland denied Petitioner’s request to remand the case to a California State court for a number of reasons (including, but not limited to, res judicata and lack of authority) and granted Respondent’s motion for summary judgment because there was no genuine issue of material fact since the Petitioner made… [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 7:43 am
However, many judges are unwilling to take this step for fear that the injunction order extends beyond what is necessary to strike the proper balance of competing rights. -- Court: United States District Court for the District of Nebraska Opinion Date: 7/2/09 Cite: Softchoice Corp. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 8:46 am by Ryke Longest
The United States argues for the special master’s disgorgement remedy Assistant to the Solicitor General Ann O’Connell argued on behalf of the United States in support of the special master’s Report. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 3:35 pm by Simon Lester
Luke Peterson of the Investment Arbitration Reporter describes the case as follows: The U.S. firm had contended that Canada imposed restrictions on the export of logs from Canada to the United States, and that these restrictions obliged the company to sell its products in Canada for less than they could fetch if exported to the United States. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 12:41 pm by Jo Dale Carothers
Lexmark sold some of the cartridges in the United States and some abroad. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 1:50 pm
  In January 2018, Wholesaler assigned to Walgreen “all of its rights, title and interest in and to” its claims against Janssen “under the antitrust laws of the United States or of any State arising out of or relating to Wholesaler’s purchase of Remicade. [read post]
  United States District Courts in California oversee some of the largest caseloads in the country.[1] Understandably reluctant to see their dockets expand, these courts often look for grounds to remand cases to state court. [read post]