Search for: "Queen v. Queen" Results 1601 - 1620 of 4,475
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2015, 11:38 am by Stephen Bilkis
Since the court did not enter any factual findings, as it does when a parent consents to the jurisdiction of the court under Section 1051(a) of the Family Court Act in Article X proceedings, no adjudication on the merits took place (Mirelle F. v Renol F., 4 Misc 3d 1011(a) [Sup Ct Queens County 2004]) and there is nothing which could affect or bind the Petitioner in the future (Metz v People, 73 Misc 2d 219 [Sup Ct Nassau County 1973]; Lockwood v Lockwood, 23 Misc… [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 11:23 am by Stephen Bilkis
Finally, proper venue for the instant claim may be Family Court, rather than the Civil Court of the City of New York, County of Queens. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 4:57 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Moreira, 2001 NY Slip Op 40122U, 4-5 [Crim Ct., Queens County 2001]). [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 4:00 am by Ben
More on the Sen Times here.On Wednesday 6th of May 2015, Professor Jonathan Griffiths (Queen Mary University) will deliver a talk entitled "Parody and copyright in EU copyright law" at the City University. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 4:49 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Naul, 3 Misc 3d 1101(A) (Crim Ct, Queens County 2004); People v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 12:14 pm by Stephen Bilkis
First, as the defendant has argued, there is the position articulated in People v Stridiron, 175 Misc 2d 16 (Criminal Ct Queens County 1997), where the court established a four-part test for determining whether a Domestic Incident converts a complaint to an information.1 The first Page 3 prong of the Stridiron test, which is what is at issue in the instant case, is that the factual allegations of a Domestic Incident Report "must contain every element of the factual allegations… [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 11:10 am by Stephen Bilkis
FORESTDALE, INC., et al., Respondents; JOSE V., Appellant. 2006-02236. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 10:43 am
The speaker is Jonathan Griffiths (Queen Mary University) and the title of his talk is "Parody and copyright in EU copyright law". [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 6:46 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Then, after the transfer of the action from Supreme Court, Kings County to Supreme Court, Suffolk County, of DD v SK and MR, the plaintiff, on September 22, 2010, filed the second action in this litigation, DD v Kevin T. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
Of the the 20 first instance decisions in the Queen’s Bench Division in media law case 10 were given by Warby J and 3 by HHJ Parkes QC, with Sir David Eady giving 2 and the remainder being shared between five other judges. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 1:21 pm
FABRICE COFFRINI/AFP/Getty Images The case is a Connecticut trial court case, Archer v. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 3:52 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In People v Trabazo [193 Misc.2d 436] (180 Misc 2d 961 [Crim Ct, Queens County 1999]), it was held that these limitations on superior courts were sound procedural mechanisms. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Heller is distinguishable and its holding does not invalidate New York's gun possession laws or regulations"]; People v Ferguson, 21 Misc 3d 1120(A), *4, 2008 WL 4694552 [Crim Ct Queens County 2008] ["the requirement that handguns be licensed in the State of New York is not tantamount to a total ban and, therefore is not a severe restriction' as was the case in Heller"]; see also Mallard v Potenza, 376 Fed Appx 132, 134 [2d Cir] [affirming partial… [read post]