Search for: "ROYAL V. STATE"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 2,233
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2024, 6:02 am
In Huerta v. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 7:34 pm
As the Court stated in R. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 3:06 pm
(Tag: International Whistleblowers) Additionally, UK whistleblower protections received a boost in a November 27, 2019, Supreme Court decision (Royal Mail Group Ltd v Jhuti). [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 8:33 am
Lauzon v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
S. 82 (1879); and Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 4:50 pm
Lawrence Sanders, State University of New York at Buffalo. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 1:11 pm
Al-Ameri (FC) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (2004) UKHL 4 also offered some support for Mr R, in Lord Bingham’s view that a choice between destitution and another option was not a choice at all. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 10:46 am
Co. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 12:49 am
Aidan O’Neill QC argues that following the case of Andy Wightman MSP and others v Secretary of State for Exiting the EU it is clear that the Article 50 notification can be withdrawn at any time. [read post]
11 May 2011, 1:30 am
Supreme Court (above left) set out in Sosa v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 12:44 pm
Bercow and a New Era of ‘Twitter Chill’ David Allen Green, writing at his Jack of Kent blog, considers: The law and culture of phone hacking The UK Human Rights blog analysed the decision in R (on the application of Sandiford) v Secretary of State for Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs [2013] 168 (Admin) – read judgment : DEATH PENALTY LEGAL FUNDING REFUSAL: APPEAL COURT CONFIRMS LIMITS OF HUMAN RIGHTS ACT *** But it isn’t all… [read post]
30 May 2013, 12:44 pm
Bercow and a New Era of ‘Twitter Chill’ David Allen Green, writing at his Jack of Kent blog, considers: The law and culture of phone hacking The UK Human Rights blog analysed the decision in R (on the application of Sandiford) v Secretary of State for Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs [2013] 168 (Admin) – read judgment : DEATH PENALTY LEGAL FUNDING REFUSAL: APPEAL COURT CONFIRMS LIMITS OF HUMAN RIGHTS ACT *** But it isn’t all… [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 6:08 am
We also want those opinions to be as clear as possible; consider Washington v. [read post]
24 May 2015, 4:08 pm
IMPRESS is to seek recognition under the Royal Charter on Self-Regulation of the Press. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 6:11 am
Yet, in both Teva and Royal Pharma, the CJEU pronounced itself only on Article 3(a) of the Regulation. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
To be sure, there are gaps, inconsistencies, and mistakes, but the statistics chapter should be a must-read for federal (and state) judges. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm
The Guardian and BBC also report a demonstration at the Osbourne-Rogers wedding which Just Stop Oil has stated was not organised by them. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
The IPKat’s friends at C5 have put together a big conference on Trade Mark Litigation, on 29 and 30 January 2015 at the Royal Windsor Hotel, Brussels. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 12:55 am
Under the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act (DMCC) which received royal assent last month “foreign powers” may own no shares whatsoever in a UK newspaper. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
v. [read post]
