Search for: "Roman v. Roman"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 1,929
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2008, 2:12 pm
to those from the British Isles; a land of turbulent history, a land shaped by time, glaciers, the wind…and the rapacious colonial greed of Romans, Vikings, Normans, Victorians… and Chavs [ASBO peasant underclass] … a land now governed by New Labour and an un-elected Prime Minister [a **** from Fife according to leading Scots blawger and Edinburgh advocate, Reactionary Snob] who wishes to curtail our freedom and ensure that everyone in Britain has an equal… [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 2:01 pm
Around the time of the Roman Empire, the land we now call England was inhabited by peoples referred to as Britons. [read post]
4 Dec 2024, 5:33 am
The court applied South African law, specifically Roman-Dutch law, to determine the requirement of an insurable interest. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Although not entirely analogous, the Supreme Court’s 2011 ruling in Snyder v. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 12:58 am
The 6th Circuit must know it’s pretty much a spoof, but… And finally…II The Diocese of Leeds tweeted its congratulations on the naming of Bradford as UK City of Culture 2025, accompanied by a photograph of the Roman Catholic Cathedral in Norwich. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 5:34 am
In fact, the conservative majority in Dobbs v. [read post]
25 May 2024, 11:12 pm
Thibaut Lesseliers, Strasbourg Observers: Föderation der Aleviten Gemeinden in Österreich v. [read post]
Symposium: The Masterpiece ruling calls for increased vigilance of discrimination in the marketplace
7 Jun 2018, 6:30 am
Romans 5:8. [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 12:16 am
Ilyin and Others v Ukraine (no. 74852/14): about the Kyiv City State Administration’s refusal to register a community of the Unification Church. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 10:12 am
Ashcroft (later v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 11:03 am
Case 4: State of California v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
(FamC (Jer) 22317-08-11 M.V. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 2:30 pm
MH, and MH v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 9:06 am
[Case Reference: Mary Stokes (on behalf of her son John Stokes) v Christian Brothers’ High School, Clonmel and The Department of Education and Skills 7 December 2010 Equality Officer Decision DEC-S2010-056)] Related PostsNovember 5, 2010 -- Underspending on Schools: Violating the Right to Education? [read post]
20 May 2022, 5:27 am
§ Roman Catholic Church Returning to Mass at Pentecost: Catholic Bishops’ Conference of England and Wales. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 9:33 pm
Prior to the 2021 decision in Google v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
As stated in Lavigne v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 5:48 am
In United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 12:09 pm
Missouri courts have repeatedly observed that "it is implicit in the scheme of the UCCJA that the trial court should make an initial determination of jurisdiction by express findings of fact before proceeding to the substantive issue of custodyRecent rulings in the last few weeks In Roman Gosserand, Respondent, v. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 11:48 pm
v:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} o:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} w:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);} Normal 0 MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 st2:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }st1:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) } /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; … [read post]
