Search for: "STATE V. POWERS"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 41,372
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2024, 1:19 pm
From Doe v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 12:51 pm
The case, LePage v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 12:25 pm
I structure my inquiry as an analysis and exposition of all three sentences of a paragraph from Marbury v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am
” The same laws permitted the president to deploy the militia without a request from a state whenever “the laws of the United States shall be opposed, or the execution thereof obstructed … by combinations too powerful to be suppressed by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, or by the powers vested in the [federal] marshals. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:46 am
See James v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
United States, on the President’s removal power, which was “severely undercut[]” by a unanimous Court less than a decade later in Humphrey’s Executor (p. 416). [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
In 1918, in Hammer v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:16 am
New York and 335-7 LLC v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:09 am
Department of State v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:04 am
Trump-v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:52 am
Damage to the plaintiffs’ property by the armed forces of the Russian Federation constitutes an exception to the state’s judicial immunity, in line with customary international law, which, according to the Court, is confirmed in Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts and in practice of the International Court of Justice (North Sea Continental Shelf (Federal Republic of Germany/Netherlands) Case) and practice of the European Court of… [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:13 pm
State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 1:17 pm
This Article is especially critical of the state action doctrine best known from Blum v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 12:36 pm
I write separately to emphasize that laws like AB 2751, which attempt to use the coercive power of the state to eliminate a viewpoint from public discourse, deserve strict scrutiny. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 11:12 am
District Court, 198 Colo. 251, 256, 598 P.2d 1038, 1041 (1979) (noting legislative purpose to prevent or remedy consumer fraud); Dunbar, 177 Colo. at 113, 493 P.2d at 668 (finding that state may enjoin deceptive practices “that have a tendency or capacity to attract customers” as a valid exercise of police power). [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Member states may set a lower percentage. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 5:15 am
A recently published decision of Saseeshkumar v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 4:05 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Brandeis’s dissent in Olmstead v. [read post]
