Search for: "STATE v MCDONALD"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 1,990
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2010, 10:10 am
And Justice McDonald helpfully explains why.I'm on board with that, I guess. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 8:05 am
On Friday, in Baxter v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 7:05 am
Also at PrawfsBlawg, Rick Hills comments on the oral argument in McDonald v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 3:36 am
”*** The Court of Appeals has already decided that health insurance for retirees is not a retirement benefit protected against being diminished or impaired by the State's Constitution [Lippman v Sewanhaka Central High School District, 66 NY2d 313].** Regarding a municipality's providing health insurance benefits to its retirees, in McDonald PBA v City of Geneva, 92 N.Y.2d 326, a decision that could significantly affect a municipal retiree's… [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 8:12 am
For federalism fans (of which I am one), the oral argument in McDonald two weeks ago oral argument in McDonald two weeks ago was only a modest disappointment. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 5:53 am
On Friday the First Circuit in United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 6:17 pm
United States and Bloate v. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 4:14 am
See Commonwealth v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 7:48 am
After the New York Times covered my exploits in the McDonald v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 7:31 am
California, 376 U.S. 483 (1964) (hotel patron); McDonald v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 6:50 am
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 6:37 am
Continuing the post-game analysis of McDonald v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 5:26 pm
" … Judge Kate O'Malley: Nominee for the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Judge Kathleen McDonald O'Malley has served as a U.S. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 6:38 am
There are two new articles about Justice Scalia’s comments during last week’s argument in the Second Amendment case McDonald v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 12:29 am
Despite High Court Skepticism, Advocates Defend Privileges Clause Push The National Law Journal A broad spectrum of scholars and advocacy groups agreed that McDonald v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 8:37 am
Two Pesos v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 6:47 am
” Ashby Jones at the WSJ Law Blog recaps last week’s “Privileges or Immunities” debate in the McDonald v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 5:12 pm
By Mike Dorf My latest FindLaw column unpacks a joke made by Justice Scalia during the oral argument last week in McDonald v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 10:30 am
McDonald asks the Court to extend that rule to municipalities and states. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 6:29 am
Not surprisingly, coverage of last week’s oral argument in McDonald v. [read post]
