Search for: "SUMMERS v. STATE"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 6,216
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2019, 4:42 pm
In it, he stated:- “To use my name as an excuse to shatter the privacy and private lives of – in particular – my parents, is utterly disgusting. [read post]
21 Sep 2019, 4:03 pm
"Deliverance" by John Boorman 1972Here’s a summer’s end snapshot about the state of copyright in Canada in 2019 as we:Digest two contrasting and competing parliamentary committee reports;Await the ruling, which could come at any time now, of the Federal Court of Appeal (“FCA”) in the Access Copyright v. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 9:30 pm
A Constitution Day plea for the study of state constitutions (Real Clear Politics). [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 10:02 am
See Daubert v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 10:02 am
See Daubert v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 4:25 pm
” Hines v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:17 am
Summer in Europe is fast passing by. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 1:41 am
On 25 March 2019, the Australian Trade Marks Office (ATMO) handed down a decision in Comite International Olympique v Tempting Brands Netherlands BV. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 11:40 am
Unlike the settlement agreement approved by Judge Patricia Seitz in the U.S. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 5:14 am
Our Investment Adviser Group assists financial service providers with complex issues that arise in the course of their business, including complying with federal and state laws and rules. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 12:21 pm
September marks the beginning of the academic year and an official end to the summer break. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 9:03 am
United States and Skilling v. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 9:05 pm
Trump continues to taunt federal employees with fear-mongering about the deep state, pay freezes, and attacks on the merit system. [read post]
7 Sep 2019, 4:16 pm
One case in particular, Glawischnig-Piesczek v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 8:51 am
One case in particular, Glawischnig-Piesczek v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 4:29 pm
United States Stanford’s Cyberlaw Blog has considered how the FTC can help safeguard privacy rights with legislative mandates from Congress. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 5:52 am
The appellants had relied upon the view of May J in Summers v London Borough of Richmond Upon Thames [2018] EWHC 782 (Admin), [2018] 1 WLR 4729, at [24], that the expression “those in the locality” in section 59 of the 2014 Act “must be read to include those who regularly visit or work in the locality, in addition to residents”. [read post]
31 Aug 2019, 3:25 pm
Kearns without cause in the summer of 2018. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 4:48 pm
Kings County, 532 F.2d 655 (9th Cir. 1975) (held that P.L. 280 did not grant land use jurisdiction to States or Counties); Segundo v. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 8:48 am
In one well-known example, DeFunis v. [read post]
