Search for: "Shields v. State" Results 1601 - 1620 of 4,624
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2007, 11:20 am
The Parties The Complainant is Facebook Inc. of Palo Alto, California, the United States of America, represented by Heller Ehrman LLP, the United States of America. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:32 pm
 Showing no faith in the political process, as they exhibited yesterday in King v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:06 am by Lou M
Doe should not have been allowed to shield the identity of her attacker, who presumably posed a threat to other women in the Corps of Cadets. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Members appealed the district court's ruling to the United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.The Circuit Court rejected the arguments advanced by the Members that they entitled to legislative immunity explaining that "because the Board Members are not parties to this action and have not raised a colorable claim of official immunity," they are not within the ambit of the Doctrine.Citing Mitchell v Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, in which the Mitchell court described… [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 7:08 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Ultimately, the court says that lesser mental states do not support a finding of contributory liability. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 2:59 pm by Juan C. Antúnez
Hisquierdo, 439 U.S. 572, 581, 99 S.Ct. 802, 59 L.Ed.2d 1 (1979) (quoting United States v. [read post]