Search for: "State Bank v. United States"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 6,686
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2020, 7:36 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 May 2021, 10:47 am
The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Badgerow v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 9:20 am
In United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 12:52 am
§ 3600, the district court erred in concluding that two of ten prerequisites for DNA testing were not satisfied (including chain of custody sufficient to ensure the evidence was not altered in a way that would affect DNA testing and that the proposed DNA testing "may produce new material evidence" raising a reasonable probability the defendant did not commit the offense), in United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 9:08 am
Justice Elena Kagan ruled against the “applicable” expense provision in her first decision for the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 8:51 am
State St. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 12:07 pm
TianRui v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
In Alden v Maine, 527 US 706, the Supreme Court of the United States found that State sovereign immunity is "implicit in the constitutional design. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 7:04 am
The case of the day, Baldiga v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 4:28 pm
., v. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
See Amend v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 7:46 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has ruled a federal district court committed error when it ordered JPMorgan Chase Bank to notify thousands of current and former employees who signed an arbitration agreement waiving their right to engage in collective action against the company about a pending class action case. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 10:07 am
Facts: This case (Reynolds v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
Pix credit here In a 53 page opinion, the United States District Court for Northern Alabama has ruled, in National Small Business Association v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 10:31 am
Hamilton Bank of Johnson City, 473 U.S. 172 (1985), a 34-year old precedent that established a federal claim was not ripe until a state takings plaintiff exhausted its remedies under state law. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 3:00 am
Those nexus requirements are (a) “that property or any property exchanged for such property is present in the United States in connection with a commercial activity carried on in the United States by the foreign state”, or (b) “that property or any property exchanged for such property is owned or operated by an agency or instrumentality of the foreign state and that agency or instrumentality is engaged is engaged in a… [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 6:08 pm
Since Watson v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 8:17 am
United States, Weyhrauch v. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 11:17 am
Australian National Bank, where the Supreme Court concluded that, in considering whether conduct that occurs both inside and outside the United States violates a statute without extraterritorial application, the courts should determine whether the conduct that is the “focus of congressional concern” occurred inside or outside the United States. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 6:51 am
Sunstein, Alan Taylor, James V. [read post]
