Search for: "State of Alabama v. United States"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 2,146
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2012, 12:37 pm
Thomas [Supreme Court of the United States via SCOTUSblog] Maples v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 11:24 am
Prescription drugs may not be sold in the United States unless they are first approved by the FDA. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:47 am
E185.96.A730 1993 Regenstein Baldwin, Lewis V. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 6:11 am
Portions of the law have been enjoined by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama and the Eleventh Circuit but the remaining sections raise some interesting issues. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 12:48 pm
However, the United States Supreme Court recently ruled in PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:21 am
United States, 11-7328; Parker v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 4:27 pm
In the United States, whilst the traditional approach to source protection laws has been to limit it to those affiliated or employed by a certain type of employer (e.g. newspaper)(see Alabama shield law, Ala. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 11:45 am
This case is U.S. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 8:45 am
States with similar laws (like Alabama) will certainly be watching closely. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:53 am
Yup, the United States Supreme Court decided two cases on our top ten list on the same day. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:39 am
However, that effort was struck down by Federal courts only a day or two after the election (Awad v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:13 am
Petitioners’ reply United States Steel Corp. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 8:55 am
U.S. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 6:41 am
United States, as well as the continuing responses to Newt Gingrich’s recent criticisms of the Court and the federal judiciary. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 10:12 am
United States [docket]. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:34 am
Supreme Court held in Gregg v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 8:09 am
In urging Supreme Court review, the state’s petition (Arizona v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 8:00 am
Patchak (Granted )Docket: 11-246Issue(s): (1) Whether the Quiet Title Act and its reservation of the United States' sovereign immunity in suits involving "trust or restricted Indian lands" apply to all suits concerning land in which the United States "claims an interest," 28 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 3:12 pm
We have been heartened by the interest in our state by the Members of Congress who have traveled to Alabama for this hearing, by the United States Department of Justice, and by other federal agencies. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 10:37 am
In Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
