Search for: "State v. Argus " Results 1601 - 1620 of 85,023
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2009, 6:30 am
As you know, we've had a few words to say about the Supreme Court's decision last week in Wyeth v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 3:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Lee Anav Chung White Kim Ruger & Richter LLP v Capone  2022 NY Slip Op 31731(U) May 25, 2022 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 657197/2020 Judge: Arlene Bluth stands for the proposition that an account stated is stronger than almost any defense. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 1:14 pm
Here is the abstract: In its 2009 Wyeth v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
This article argues that Tompkins and his witnesses were not telling the truth. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 8:31 am
The briefs filed earlier on the matter argue at length that a federal regulation like that of the FTC places an implied preemption over the states. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 1:17 pm by WIMS
Plaintiffs-Appellants appealed the district court's dismissal of their pre-enforcement challenge to the anti-animal-fighting provisions of the Animal Welfare Act (AWA), naming as defendants the United States, the Secretary and Department of Agriculture, the Attorney General and Department of Justice, and the Postmaster General and the United States Postal Service. [read post]
1 May 2013, 4:44 am by Timothy P. Flynn
  The consensus posits that SCOTUS will avoid a sweeping constitutional ruling along the lines of Roe v Wade and instead, will issue an opinion that the same-sex marriage issue is a matter to be decided on a state-by-state basis.The SCOTUS term ends on June 20th; an opinion on the same-sex marriage issue is expected between now and then.www.clarkstonlegal.cominfo@clarkstonlegal.com [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 10:00 pm
The CAFC also adopted reasoning by the Supreme Court in Oil States Energy Servs, LLC v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:38 am
The net effect of the court advising the jury that the State had no obligation to produce evidence, which was indisputably available to it, either explicitly or implicitly relieved the State, in the minds of the jurors, of the burden to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]