Search for: "State v. Bias" Results 1601 - 1620 of 4,612
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2010, 8:56 pm by Barry Barnett
  So much so that Golden State courts have struck down class-action bans that show up in consumer contracts whether they apply to lawsuits, Discover Bank v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 4:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
However, the record does not demonstrate that the court was so vexed that it could not be impartial (22 NYCRR 100.3[E][1]; see Liteky v United States, 510 US 540, 555-556 [1994]; Hass & Gottlieb v Sook Hi Lee, 55 AD3d 433, 434 [1st Dept 2008]; People v A.S. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 9:01 am
FBL Financial Services (08-441), on the level of proof required in a "mixed motive" job bias case. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 11:24 am by Rick Esenberg
Rick Esenberg is the founder, president and general counsel of the Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty, which filed an amicus brief in support of the state appellants in Gill v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 10:30 pm
As the United States Supreme Court wrote in Chessman v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 5:00 am by Maureen Johnston
Ryan is limited to excusing only the default of a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel; and (2) whether, under the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA), a state-court adjudication of a judicial-bias claim is per se unreasonable under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Encino Motorcars v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 12:29 pm by Kevin Johnson
  Judulang contends that the BIA’s change in practice in 2005, which the en banc Ninth Circuit followed in Abebe v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 8:37 am by Steven Cohen
Facts:  In this case (Keystone Transportation Solutions, LLC v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 6:29 am by Jacques Singer-Emery
Paradis stated that the default rule, set by Supreme Court precedent in Lijeberg v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 8:48 am by Eric Dama
In 1973, the United States Supreme Court issued a landmark employment discrimination case, McDonnell Douglas v. [read post]