Search for: "State v. C. R."
Results 1601 - 1620
of 13,580
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
Ruiz v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 2:47 pm
In Coleman v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:42 pm
Beyer was recently mentioned in Hunter, Jr. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 11:54 am
How do states’ negotiation alternatives influence the concessions they receive in multilateral negotiations? [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 8:40 am
Corrupt Practices Prevention Act, 1854, 17 & 18 Vict., c. 102, § 5 (Eng.), reprinted in Henry Jeffreys Bus [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 3:07 pm
Since the program’s inception, the SEC has received tips from whistleblowers in 123 countries outside the United States, claims have been filed from 72 countries, and the SEC has made substantial awards to foreign residents who have provided information. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
Dorman v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 2:00 am
C-48-CV-2016-00633 (C.P. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
In McGirt v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 2:26 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Vedanta Resources Plc & Anor v Lungowe & Ors, heard 15-16 Jan 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 Unwired Planet International Ltd & Anor… [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 1:42 am
Lord Mance stressed that the so-called Miller decisions of the Supreme Court in R (Miller) v Secretary of State [2017] UKSC 5 and R (Miller) v The Prime Minister, Cherry v Advocate General for Scotland (Miller II) [2019] UKSC 41, dealing with the parliamentary procedure of the withdrawal from the EU, are extraordinary regarding the degree of judicial activism from a British point of view. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 12:30 am
V. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 7:17 am
Other IP * Seguros R. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 9:16 am
Alter and Laurence R. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 2:51 am
Such modes of service where the defendant is likely to be domiciled in another state have been condemned as insufficient by the ECJ in cases such as: Case 166/80 Peter Klomps v Karl Michel [1981] ECR 1593; Case C-300/14 Imtech Marine Belgium NV v Radio Hellenic SA ECLI:EU:C:2015:825; Case C-289/17 Collect Inkasso OU v Aint 2018 EU:C:2018. [read post]
[Josh Blackman] An Oregon Criminal Prosecution of Federal Officers Could Be Removed to Federal Court
17 Jul 2020, 11:52 pm
This strange dynamic occurred on remand in Strauder v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 2:35 pm
C. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 10:19 am
From Al Saud v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
C. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 7:28 pm
” That said, pursuant to the CJEU’s decision, organizations can no longer rely on the Privacy Shield framework to cover transfers of EU personal data to the United States. [read post]
