Search for: "State v. D. H." Results 1601 - 1620 of 3,857
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2012, 9:13 pm
Each post in this Year in Review series features a different federal courthouse in each state of the Union. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 4:10 am by Xandra Kramer
The Dutch legislator has consulted the Dutch State Commission for Private International Law and the Advisory Commission on Civil Procedure in relation to that requirement. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 12:52 pm by Liisa Speaker
(Bowers v VanderMeulenBowers, 278 Mich App 287, 294; 750 NW2d 597 (2008). [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 5:47 am by Jonathan H. Adler
§ 12-30-121(1)(d) (designating gender-affirming care as "legally protected health-care activity"), and Minn. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 5:03 am by Susan Brenner
  Rule 41(d) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure describes the process of applying for a federal search warrant, like the one at issue here. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by Lyonette Louis-Jacques
And only once did I imagine the parties in a case and give them faces – State v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 1:03 pm
Back to the Restatement: A validly marries three wives, first B, then C, and D, in state X [here "state" would likely mean a foreign country -EV]. [read post]
2 Sep 2017, 9:00 am by Michael H Cohen
FDA states that 510(k) submitters may request information on their 510(k) review status 90 days after the initial log-in date of the 510(k). [read post]