Search for: "State v. David."
Results 1601 - 1620
of 14,224
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2018, 1:42 pm
But that's a decision to be made under the amendment process of Article V. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment provides:No person [1] shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, [2] who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to… [read post]
11 May 2015, 11:46 am
[Houghton Miflin v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 3:45 am
Yesterday lawyers for both sides presented the Court with proposals to divide up the two-and-a-half hours allocated for oral argument in the challenges to state bans on same-sex marriage and the recognition of same-sex marriages from other states. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 1:22 pm
See Graham v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 11:14 am
In a recent ruling in David v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 11:01 am
State is a Sept. 24, 2007 COA opinion (see ILB entry here) re sentencing. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 10:18 am
The Court stated that the five-step process outlined in Tingler and adopted in Osborn v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 10:40 am
In a tort case (GISELLE GATTORNO and DAVID IGLESIAS, Appellants, v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 5:24 am
No, according to Meyer v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 9:43 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 6:27 pm
The settlement resolves a federal lawsuit, David Oster et al. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 1:46 pm
By: David Group, NY Partner There are now over 1,300 COVID-19 business interruption insurance coverage cases filed nationally in federal and state courts. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 6:00 am
Judge David J. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 9:04 am
David Kappos. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
These rights will “beat the air” when the UK leaves the EU but they cannot lawfully be defeated by the exercise of the royal prerogative. 14:35: Scoffield QC begins with issue 1 – the Northern Ireland Act 1998 is not neutral to the issue of whether an act of Parliament is needed before the government can give notice under Art 50 TEU. 14:33: David Scoffield QC takes the floor on behalf of Agnew and others – individuals and human rights organisations who are concerned… [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 9:32 am
Glukhin V. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 12:03 pm
Burke v. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 3:23 pm
I think the real answer is expressed well in United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 5:09 am
Breyer stated: “We are diving headlong into an area called price regulation. [read post]
