Search for: "State v. Governor"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 6,540
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
Plaintiff had alleged that the Governor holds authority over the workings of the Montana State Prison and harbors "anti-Catholic feelings. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 2:31 pm
OF GOVERNORS, FRS 22-1074 SHEETZ, GEORGE V. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 6:50 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Criminal Opinions Body: SC17413 - State v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 11:44 am
State Corporation Commission. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 10:14 am
Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 8:46 am
On June 15, 2011, the Michigan Supreme Court granted the Governor’s request for an advisory opinion regarding the constitutionality of the reduction or elimination of tax exemption for pension incomes in 2011 PA 38. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 10:36 am
When the Supreme Court declared in Atkins v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 1:13 pm
Thorpe v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 4:05 pm
Wyeth v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 6:12 am
The new governor — the infamous Scott Walker — has a different approach to balancing the state budget. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
at 128, citing Fetahu v New Jersey Tr. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
at 128, citing Fetahu v New Jersey Tr. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 1:17 am
See Morales v. [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 6:11 am
Dobbs also did not mention that the Mississippi governor who championed the bill and signed it into law was the latest in the state’s uninterrupted line of white male governors. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 10:01 pm
(R(I) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2002] EWCA Civ 888). [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 10:28 pm
" We have been hired to represent the Governor and the Governor's Office" in the investigation, Anchorage attorney Thomas V. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 11:45 am
Two Unnamed Petitioners v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 5:28 pm
City of San Diego v. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 3:28 am
The Court of Appeals found that the underlying statute clearly and unambiguously stated that in banc review was to be conducted by "incumbent" judges, being those appointed by the Governor and confirmed by the Senate. [read post]
27 May 2008, 7:03 am
A state law struck down by the state’s highest court was invalid from the outset, so the law switching to special election instead of appointment by the governor did not bring about a change in election law under the Act, and the governor was free to resume the practice of appointment to fill commission vacancies, the Court ruled. [read post]
