Search for: "State v. Hazard" Results 1601 - 1620 of 3,318
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2011, 6:00 am by Will Bland
M/V FURNESS BRIDGE, 558 F.2d 790 (5th Cir. 1977), elaborated and, citing Trade Banner, stated, “The wharfinger’s duty to warn applies only to ‘any hidden hazard or deficiency . . . not reasonable known to the ship owner. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 1:10 pm by Alain Leibman
United States, 390 U.S. 39, 53 (1968) (privilege available when invoker “is confronted by substantial and ‘real’ . . . hazards of incriminating); Hoffman v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 8:46 am by Julie Lam
  The parties are ordered to brief whether the Court of Appeals erred when it reversed the grant of summary disposition to the defendant by concluding: (1) that a reasonable trier of fact could find that the defendant owed a duty to the plaintiff because it had used the State highway in a way that either caused the defect at issue or increased the hazard of the defect; and (2) that the plaintiff stated a claim for public nuisance. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 6:43 am by Bexis
We found the decision in Mills v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 8:20 pm by Mike Aylward
Co., 563 N.W.2d 724 (Minn. 1997) and Northern States Power Co. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 9:32 am
  The report states that "At present, there is inadequate information on: i) hazard identification, ii) exposure assessment, iii) uptake (including physiologically normal and compromised human skin), iv) the role of physico-chemical parameters of nanoparticles determining absorption and transport across membranes in the gut and lungs, v) the role of physico-chemical parameters of nanoparticles in systemic circulation determining biokinetics and… [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 2:15 pm by JURIST Staff
The bench heard the plea of a 17-year old Delhi student, Aditya Dubey (Aditya Dubey v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 2:44 pm by Eugene Volokh
Here’s a very brief summary of that strand: In a long line of cases (such as Presbyterian Church in the United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Noah Brown
In the arguments, the justices focused little on the facts of the current case, Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 1:28 pm by Lyle Denniston
It took nearly a half-hour for the authors of the majority and dissenting opinions to orally proclaim in the courtroom their differences, in the six-to-two ruling in Environmental Protection Agency v. [read post]