Search for: "State v. King"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 5,436
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2015, 7:27 am
There is more coverage of and commentary on King v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 10:07 am
"Rembar details the fascinating case of Ashford v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 6:54 pm
King, which concerned the "success kid" meme. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
In Wirring v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 11:00 pm
”And in response to the defendant’s objection as to the timeliness of the litigation, the AD2 thought that while the plaintiffs may have missed the window to bring the claim under a New York State “theft of equity” statute, [Real Property Law § 265-a], they timely brought their common-law fraud claim within the governing six-year period [CPLR 213[8]].Now there’s no voiding that ….# # #DECISIONR. v K & Y. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 5:00 am
”Since J.C. wasn't able to rebut the franchisors’ showing that they “lacked the requisite control over the manner in which Plaza Toyota serviced vehicles,” the AD2 thought the denial of the dismissal motion was an error and reversed; dismissing all claims and cross-claims that had been asserted against those defendants.Interestingly, the failure to introduce a copy of the dealership agreement didn’t negate the franchisors’ entitlement to relief, nor did their… [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
After the Kings County Supreme Court denied that request, an appeal followed.While the full definition appears below, a “serious injury” under the law is specifically defined. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 4:00 am
And there wasn't a bigger trial than People of the State of California v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 8:24 am
Kimbrell v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 11:00 pm
” Since those particulars were not supplied, the AD2 didn't think the requested relief should have been entertained.Sorry, but that’s about all we’re able to disclose.# # #DECISIONMuchnik v Mendez Trucking, Inc. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:18 am
In the case of Hendrix v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 11:00 pm
” Since those particulars were not supplied, the AD2 didn't think the requested relief should have been entertained.Sorry, but that’s about all we’re able to disclose.# # #DECISIONMuchnik v Mendez Trucking, Inc. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 4:20 am
Koschitzki, (NY Kings Cty. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in Gelfuso v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 5:00 am
Because her pleading contained only “bare legal conclusions” as to the purported “centralized control of labor relations,” the AD2 left the dismissal undisturbed.Don’t think anyone broadcasted that.# # #L. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 7:31 am
In Lax v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:56 am
On Wednesday, in State v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 6:04 am
King, supra (quoting Hoffa v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 10:40 am
Burger King, 471 U.S. at 474. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 7:06 am
The court agreed with the airline that the plaintiff’s discrimination claim was preempted by the Warsaw Convention, citing King v. [read post]
