Search for: "State v. Lively"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 26,060
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2011, 8:59 am
Independent Living Center of Southern California, in which California Medicaid providers are challenging the state’s proposed ten-percent-cut to their payments. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 8:42 am
DONET V. [read post]
21 May 2020, 12:51 pm
Ankenbrandt v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 3:10 pm
Heather’s Legal Summaries: R v Trinchi, 2019 ONCA 356 R v Trinchi is the most recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision in a string of cases related to the offence of voyeurism under s. 162(1) of the Criminal Code (see our previous post on the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R v Jarvis). [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 12:03 pm
Cheryl Thurston lived in a group home facility operated by New York State’s Office for People with Developmental Disabilities. [read post]
10 Sep 2022, 7:27 am
[Colombia] [Petition granted] In Ruiz v Zinsou, 2022 WL 3931454, (N.D. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:51 am
Here's how SCOTUSblog described the issue in the case, which is called Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 8:25 pm
May v. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 7:33 am
Have the children lived in New York? [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 9:39 am
Baures v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 9:36 am
Under Sternberg v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 9:01 am
But it’s not bigger than the federal government or the Constitution of the United States of America.That’s the lesson the Third Circuit handed down today with its decision in the Lozano v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 4:39 am
State v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 9:30 am
A single drunk driver can alter the course of lives forever. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
In State of Oregon v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 10:17 am
Holder v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 12:08 pm
If Joliet is allowed to condemn and demolish Evergreen Terrace, the displaced residents will likely have to look outside Joliet for a new place to live. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 2:31 pm
” United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 2:40 pm
Hoppe v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 2:15 pm
General Martins begins by calling Judge Pohl’s attention to the ‘ten-category framework’ from his 2014 discovery order in United States v. al Nashiri. [read post]
