Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 3,609
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2015, 1:12 pm
Dittman v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:59 pm
However, Lords Phillips stated: “I do not think that the principal was purporting to impose a disciplinary sanction. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 8:13 am
Metropolitan v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 4:03 am
Scarlet v SABAM The SABAM is the Belgian equivalent of PRS, a royalty collecting agency representing music artists. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 9:30 pm
Michael McConnell discusses Trump v. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 4:02 pm
In a rare radio interview this week the President of the Supreme Court, Lord Neuberger, said that politicians were too slow to defend judges after November’s Brexit case. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 2:53 am
In upholding the first instance decision, Lord Justice Collins stated that the interests of justice were not confined to the interests of justice in England and that the international dimension of this case demanded a broader view.This judgment provides helpful commentary on the law and practice of confidentiality and privilege as applicable to arbitration proceedings and raises questions of considerable practical importance relating to national and international arbitration. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 9:25 pm
Lord knows I better. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 8:38 am
In Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Group plc v Customs and Excise Commissioners [2001] EWCA Civ 1476 we had Lord Justice Sedley describing the world of VAT as “a kind of fiscal theme park in which factual and legal realities are suspended or inverted”. [read post]
6 Feb 2021, 2:26 pm
And the closing words of Article V read that “no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 2:39 am
As Lord Justice Toulson observed: There is no universal yardstick for determining the scope of a state’s positive obligations under article 8. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 9:24 am
” The Secretary of State appealed these findings. [read post]
9 Jun 2006, 5:49 am
When it was submitted to the House of Lords that the operation of these doctrines would violate Article 6 ECHR, Lord Hoffmann said that there seemed to him ‘to be much force in this submission’ (R v. [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 3:53 am
He tried to get the court action against him postponed for a year, but Lord Doherty refused to grant the request.Mr McKenzie then faced a court action at the Edinburgh court. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 12:49 am
Aidan O’Neill QC argues that following the case of Andy Wightman MSP and others v Secretary of State for Exiting the EU it is clear that the Article 50 notification can be withdrawn at any time. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 5:57 am
These cases demonstrate clearly the change of position as compared with Allianz v West Tankers and Turner v Grovit, respectively. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 1:00 am
The panel will be Lord Neuberger, Lord Kerr and Lord Reed. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:00 am
R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor, heard 27-28 Mar 2017. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 1:46 am
” Lord Reed stated that s 101(2) could not have been intended to enable the courts to rewrite provisions which were, on their face, unambiguously outside legislative competence. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 9:50 am
Lord Neuberger gave the only judgment. [read post]
