Search for: "State v. Main"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 11,546
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2017, 9:54 pm
The main objective for the judge is to achieve the best interest of the child standard. [read post]
13 Aug 2024, 6:13 am
From Thursday's decision in Youth 71Five Ministries v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 9:30 pm
Around the Colloquia: Malick Ghachem, Maine Law, presented "The Legal History of Prisoner Voting: A View from the Northeastern United States” to his faculty’s workshop. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:53 am
The main battlegrounds on the CPO stage in Merricks are on commonality and suitability, where the Supreme Court will hopefully bring clarity. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 6:21 am
In Otsuka, et al. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 6:30 am
Landmark Gay Marriage Couple Divorces In the landmark Massachusetts case of Goodridge v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 2:04 pm
Florida; NFIB v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 4:00 am
State v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 4:23 pm
In Savva Terentyev v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 8:58 am
This move represents a shift in the Court’s stare decisis jurisprudence, and would seem to overrule Casey v. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 10:42 am
Case Name: Reece v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 11:06 pm
Main Request, Rule 111(2) EPC2.1 At the time when the contested decision was issued, the requirements for issuing a refusal using a standard form referring to previous communications were set out in the Guidelines for Examination in the EPO, November 2016, C-V, 15.2.According to the first paragraph of Guideline C-V, 15.2, in order to comply with the requirement that a decision be reasoned (Rule 111(2)), it is only possible to use this form of decision where the previous… [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 5:22 pm
(Here's my April 2010 post on Hoang v. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 8:27 am
The majority distinguishes the old Supreme Court Keeton v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:46 am
The main issue before the Supreme Court was therefore the correct construction of the provision in Schedule 1 and the way in which this test ought to be applied in practice. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 7:56 am
In Boone v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm
Nov. 8, 2012), primarily concerning its fraudulent joinder holding – in accord with the “overwhelming weight of authority” in other states – that a hospital cannot be strictly liable for claimed defects in drugs and medical devices that are used in medical procedures within its walls. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:30 am
Supreme Court in Arizona v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 1:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 9:49 am
Maine Maryland 70 70/None Constitution: Art. [read post]
