Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 19,306
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2020, 9:48 am
Case citation: Rupp v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 11:03 am
The CJEU stated that European Union law does not preclude the proprietor of a national trademark from opposing the import of identical goods bearing the same trade mark and coming from another Member State, in which said trade mark, which initially belonged to the same proprietor, is currently owned by a third party. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Singer v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Singer v. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 4:33 pm
Plumrose Holding Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 1:26 pm
In De Grandpré Chait v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 9:05 am
Article 7(1) of the First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks in its original version provided:‘The trade mark shall not entitle the proprietor to prohibit its use in relation to goods which have been put on the market in the Community under that trade mark by the proprietor or with his consent. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 4:26 am
At Slate, Mark Joseph Stern observes that Dimaya “marked the first time Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg assigned a majority opinion in her nearly 25 years on the high court. [read post]
9 Jan 2025, 6:32 am
Look Cycle International v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 10:34 am
See United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 5:17 pm
¶40 (quoting Bingham School v. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 1:45 pm
v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 8:00 am
Miller v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 4:12 pm
KGaA v. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 6:56 pm
There are umpteen judgments which state that courts would not decide how tender conditions should be framed [See, for instance, Directorate Of Education v. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 8:16 am
Trademark * Carter v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 2:12 pm
That means:“…The question of the extent to which a sign which is protected in a Member State confers the right to prohibit the use of a subsequent trade mark must be examined in the light of the applicable national law. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 9:03 am
In Pucci v. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 11:14 am
In Ryan et al v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 6:30 am
GraberAn Unacknowledged Constitutional Crisis: United States v. [read post]
