Search for: "State v. Marks" Results 1601 - 1620 of 19,481
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2010, 3:59 pm by INFORRM
They mark the seriousness of the defamation and are a part of the vindication. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:07 pm by Andrew Hamm
Lyle reported on the decisions in Fisher and United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 10:44 am by JURIST Staff
In 1993, in the case of Amaratunge v Sirimal, Justice Mark Fernando of Sri Lanka’s Supreme Court made a remark that remains relevant. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 10:33 am by Lazar Radic
Many observers—including Epic CEO Tim Sweeney—have marked this as an unmitigated loss for Epic. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 9:05 am
Article 7(1) of the First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks in its original version provided:‘The trade mark shall not entitle the proprietor to prohibit its use in relation to goods which have been put on the market in the Community under that trade mark by the proprietor or with his consent. [read post]
7 Mar 2025, 3:41 am
To establish priority, Petitioner Kennedy had to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that it owns proprietary rights in "a mark or trade name previously used in the United States . . . and not abandoned . . . . [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 6:54 am by Amy Howe
  Mark Walsh provided a view from the Courtroom for this blog. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 3:51 pm by Marty Lederman
Earlier today, Mark Tushnet posted about Justice Thomas’s recent eye-opening concurrence in the Court’s denial of cert. in McKee v. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 12:50 pm
.* When its comes to "deadwood", leave it in the State of South Dakota and out of Trademark Office policyIs unused "deadwood"really cluttering up trade mark registers? [read post]