Search for: "State v. Nations" Results 1601 - 1620 of 42,967
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Amber M. Rogers, Keenan Judge
Circuit”) partially overturned a decision issued by the National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”) in Absolute Healthcare d/b/a Curaleaf Arizona v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 2:41 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The appellant Sri Lankan national claimed asylum on the grounds that he had been a member of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelan (LTTE), and had been detained and tortured by Sri Lankan security forces. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 3:09 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
It would be inconsistent with that regime for a national court to substitute its own assessment. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 3:53 pm by zshapiro
While some of the Circuit judges wanted to base the decision on Toten the majority instead based the decision on United States v. [read post]
Disrupt & Dismantle Threat Actors Pillar 2 discussed the commitment to use “all instruments of national power to disrupt and dismantle threat actors whose actions threaten our interests,” focusing on heading off “sustained cyber-enabled campaigns that would threaten the national security or public safety of the United States. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Mary B. McCord
Mary McCord is one of the counsel representing former superintendent of the New York Department of Financial Services Maria Vullo in National Rifle Association v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 4:45 pm by Lawrence Solum
Ramirez (Loyola University of Chicago School of Law) has posted Race in America 2021: A Time to Embrace Beauharnais v. [read post]
While the defense argued that the defendants were not guilty of subversion as subverting state power involves the use or threat of force, the court referenced HKSAR v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 9:41 am by Seth Davis
Kerrick, a criminal sentencing case, and National Security Archive v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 5:00 am by INFORRM
The ECtHR goes on stating that “the issue in the instant case is not defamatory statements of fact but value judgments or opinions, as was admitted by the domestic courts”. [75] [Was this really admitted by the national courts? [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 1:17 pm
Today is the deadline for amicus briefs in support of the respondent state in Giles v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 6:46 am by Jacqueline Lipton
Johnson (Seton Hall University School of Law) Elizabeth Pollman (Loyola Law School, Los Angeles) Margaret V. [read post]