Search for: "State v. Price" Results 1601 - 1620 of 11,951
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2017, 10:00 pm
Post By Blog Staff On June 12, 2017, the Supreme Court released a decision in Sandoz Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 1:36 am
It states that women may see their motor premiums rise, but may also benefit from receiving higher payments when purchasing retirement income products. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 4:37 pm by Jennifer Mersing
  The Second Circuit found this pricing mechanism was different than the Maryland program struck down by the Supreme Court in Hughes v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 4:37 pm by Jennifer Mersing
  The Second Circuit found this pricing mechanism was different than the Maryland program struck down by the Supreme Court in Hughes v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 8:43 am by Eric Goldman
In support of that conclusion, the court makes this murky statement: “courts in this Circuit have repeatedly held that a plaintiff may state a claim under the Lanham Act where the defendant (1) interfered with the plaintiff’s ability to offer its own commercial services, and/or (2) used the Internet. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 5:04 am
Following the Test-Achats ASBL v Conseil des Ministres (Case C-236/09) ruling by the ECJ on 1 March 2011, insurers will no longer be able to use gender as a factor when pricing insurance contracts (see our previous blog here). [read post]