Search for: "State v. Price"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 13,234
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2014, 3:13 pm
By Jason Rantanen VirnetX, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 5:47 am
In a decision issued on April 21, 2008, Bell BCI Company v, United States, the United States Court of Federal Claims issued a decision that can only be described as a “slam dunk” for the contractor. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
In NML Capital v Argentina, the question for the Supreme Court was whether one such investor, a New York fund that bought into Argentinian bonds which were subsequently defaulted, could enforce its judgment against assets of the Argentinian state in the United Kingdom. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 4:14 pm
The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari today in Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 11:55 am
In the opening brief in United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
In Huppe v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
Participating States must also comply with various other requirements, including those that protect against waste, fraud, and abuse; those that protect the health and safety, and the privacy, of Medicaid beneficiaries; those that ensure that the States adequately accomplish the goals of the program (see the recent decision in Douglas v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 9:30 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 7:31 am
Sony Network Entertainment * No Breach of Contract Claim from Mid-Stream Change of WSJ Online Pricing – Lebowitz v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 3:51 am
It did the same thing back in 2007 in State v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 5:07 pm
[See also, The State of Bihar vs. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 3:33 pm
In Jensen v. iShares Trust, 2020 Cal. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 4:26 am
The case of Marine Travelift, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:37 am
In calculating the damages it must first be established what the difference is between the contract price and the market price of the goods at the time they ought to have been delivered. [read post]
11 Jun 2016, 4:10 pm
In her decision in Wong v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 8:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 8:44 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2007, 8:02 am
Earlier this week, the qui tam case of United States ex. rel.Louanne Boothe v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 6:00 am
Starting with the seminal case, Medinol Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 4:12 am
See Twombly, 550 U.S. at 563 ('[O]nce a claim has been stated adequately, it may be supported by showing any set of facts consistent with the allegations in the complaint.'); McZeal v. [read post]
