Search for: "State v. Quick" Results 1601 - 1620 of 4,925
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2016, 1:49 pm by Edward DeLisle and Maria Panichelli
The Economic Loss Rule and the Ability to Sue Design Professionals without a Contract A recent Maryland case, Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 3:05 pm by Steve Wells
A relatively quick test that would be paid for by another party means that the State is not inconvenienced and we can settle clearly Osborne's guilt or innocence. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 3:02 pm
United States (1969 Trade Cases ¶72,730) and United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 3:30 pm by Morris Turek
”  This slogan also appears on Dirt Cheap’s website, a screenshot of which appears below: A quick search of the Trademark Office’s records reveals that Dirt Cheap has been using the DIRT CHEAP mark since 1993 and owns federal registrations for DIRT CHEAP (Reg. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 11:54 pm by INFORRM
On 6 and 7 December 2016 there was a trial in the case of Flymenow Ltd v Quick Air Jet Charter GmbH. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 6:29 am
The state also relied on comments the Supreme Court made (not necessary to the decision) in Knowles v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
A similar situation occurred in the 2019 case of Royal Bank of Canada v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 7:20 am by Anita Krishnakumar
Observers have been quick to quote the penultimate sentence of Justice Stephen Breyer’s dissent (“Today’s decision can only cause one to wonder which cases the Court will overrule next”) and point to Hyatt as a harbinger that Roe v. [read post]