Search for: "State v. Race"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 8,669
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm
Tribal rights, water rights, states’ rights and the Colorado River: What’s at stake in the SCOTUS case, Arizona v. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 12:03 pm
Most people are aware that state and federal anti-discrimination laws protect them from adverse employment actions on the basis of certain protected classes, such as race, gender, disability, and age. [read post]
24 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
Here are the materials in State of Washington v. [read post]
1 Jan 2008, 4:08 am
United States 461 U.S. 574 (1983)(upholding loss of tax exempt status to private religious school that discriminated on the basis of race)City of Akron v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:01 am
Common Cause and Lamone v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 11:52 am
In Williams v. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 10:30 am
Supreme Court case Plessy v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 5:54 pm
Ore.) in Hunter v. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 10:38 am
In the leading Insular case, Downes v. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 2:48 pm
The topic is Tinker v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 11:18 am
This week, however, the FCC's bad news was followed very quickly by the Supreme Court's decision today in McCutcheon v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 1:54 pm
In Dept of State v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 7:46 pm
petition of the day is: Title: Felkner v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 8:28 am
This contribution to our symposium on Fisher v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 9:15 am
-Mexico border remain near record highs (Pew Fact Tank, Jan. 2023) [text]"Trump v Biden: how different are their policies on the US-Mexico border? [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:53 am
The timing of Whitby could not be more apropos as the SCT is considering Snyder v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 12:01 am
The state’s race-based tax exemptions cannot survive this strict scrutiny level of review. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am
Briefly: At PrawfsBlawg, Will Baude covers United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 2:50 am
Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 9:19 am
One of the arguments in the amicus brief I filed on Perich’s behalf concerned the Court’s leading free exercise precedent, Employment Division v. [read post]
