Search for: "State v. Sullivan"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 2,489
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2023, 11:50 am
R. 501.5 See United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 11:50 am
R. 501.5 See United States v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:16 am
Sullivan. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 9:40 am
Sullivan, 12 So.3d 771 (Fla. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 6:09 am
In Matter of Sullivan v. [read post]
14 Oct 2024, 5:00 am
" The Plaintiffs argued that the Appellate Division's holding is inconsistent with the reasoning underlying the "integral part of the construction" exception because it extends the exception so far beyond the Court's decision in O'Sullivan v IDI Const. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 1:12 pm
Coffee said we should all keep our eyes out for the Third Circuit’s forthcoming en banc opinion in Sullivan v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 5:55 am
And in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
The district court dismissed the case under Rule 12 for failure to state a claim, but the Court of Appeals (Sullivan, Chin and Bianco) reinstates the claim.How does this case fare under Littlejohn and Vega? [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:57 pm
Alex Sullivan, 27. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 2:02 pm
Sullivan, 500 U.S. 173, 200 (1991). [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 8:39 am
Balistrieri v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am
An appeal is expected, which would give the Supreme Court the opportunity to reconsider the so-called “Sullivan standard,” which states that is ought to be difficult for any public official to prove that a falsehood was damaging enough to surmount First Amendm [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 7:48 am
Circuit stayed a decision by Judge Emmet Sullivan of the U.S. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 9:53 am
First Amendment jurisprudence including New York Times v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 5:00 am
Sullivan, 451 F.3d 884 (U.S. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 4:00 am
” Sullivan v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 5:42 pm
In other words, the state prisoner must give the state courts an opportunity to act on his claims before he presents those claims to a federal court in a habeas petition.Interpreting this exhaustion requirement, the United States Supreme Court in O’Sullivan v Boerckel (526 U.S. 838 [1999]) held that a prisoner who fails to present his claims in a petition for discretionary review to a state court of last resort has not properly presented… [read post]
