Search for: "State v. Word"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 40,639
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2020, 1:19 pm
With this week’s ruling in Espinoza v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
In referring to the recent TCL v Ericsson decision from the Central District of California (see Kat post here), Judge Labson stated:"The Court is not persuaded by Plaintiffs’ argument that summary judgment on Count III of the FAC is warranted. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 6:49 am
Static Control Components, Inc. v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 5:46 pm
The Upper Tribunal has handed down judgment in the case of Raed Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department IA/21/21631/2011. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
Raich v. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 11:35 am
A culture war is brewing in the State of New York, as an upstate school district is challenging the Department of Educations' order that the district get rid of Native American imagery as the school mascot.The case is Cambridge Central School District v. [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 9:28 am
State, 12 S.W.3d 6, 30 (Tex. 1999); see Walker v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 6:39 am
Koch v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 9:32 am
In other words, "the net national effect of R&D tax incentives on R&D spending [was] near zero." [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 4:21 am
The principal author, Justice Scalia, held that the word "proceeds" lacks a clear definition, especially in light of the lack of legislative history here, so the rule of lenity requires it be interpreted in favor of the defendant: proceeds=profits, not gross receipts. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 11:42 pm
State Immunity, Violation of Human Rights and the Individual’s Right for Reparations – A Comment on the ICJ’s Judgment of February 2, 2012 (Germany v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:24 am
The Court will consider whether the wording of the FCC’s policy banning “fleeting” indecency – including the “s-word”, the “f-word”, and images of nudity – is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 5:31 am
Twitter v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 5:35 am
State v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 8:17 am
Last week's Alabama Supreme Court decision, T.C. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 3:11 pm
The first word that comes to my mind is: "ridiculous. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 10:17 am
Corp. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 1:01 am
United States v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 12:29 pm
I am doubtful that Justice Barrett would have joined United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:26 pm
Whether an in-state agent’s activities amount to “solicitation” may be determined using the traditional definition of the word. [read post]
