Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection" Results 1601 - 1620 of 4,764
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2021, 12:37 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
By standing up to consumer fraud and consumer rip-offs, and in the right case filing consumer protection lawsuits and class-actions you too can help ensure that other consumers’ rights are protected from consumer rip-offs and unscrupulous or dishonest practices. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 3:41 am by Jani
Yet this didn't seem to be enough for the Aussies, and recently new changes to the 1968 Act have been brought up, flaring up opinions on both sides of the spectrum especially since the changes pertain largely to infringement. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 12:40 pm by Bexis
This is because off-label promotion is not inherently fraudulent; truthful off-label promotion of drugs does not violate RICO or state consumer protection laws.In re Epogen & Aranesp Off-Label Marketing & Sales Practices Litigation, 2009 WL 1703285, at *7 (C.D. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am by Eugene Volokh
Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc., 425 U.S. 748, 771 (1976) (“Untruthful speech, commercial or otherwise, has never been protected for its own sake.”) [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am by Eugene Volokh
Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc., 425 U.S. 748, 771 (1976) (“Untruthful speech, commercial or otherwise, has never been protected for its own sake. [read post]
2 May 2010, 3:47 pm by Woodrow Hartzog
 A few of these decisions seem to pop up every year. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 7:45 pm
But TJX stressed that it "firmly believes" that it did not violate any consumer protection or data security laws [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 1:59 pm by Deepak Gupta
 Now, the courts may protect you because you are stupid, but you haven't been coerced. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 12:16 am by Jani Ihalainen
As said above, the provisions don't require the use of the PDO in conjunction with goods that don't correspond to the specifications, for it to be at odds with the protection offered by PDOs, even if corresponding goods are used as ingredients in them. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 12:30 pm by randal shaheen
Birdsong’s allegations were typical of many recent “consumer protection” class actions: that a product is defective because it poses a hypothetical risk to users who can ignore warnings and common sense and use a product unsafely. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 9:05 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Final and related reason HD is necessary: they’ve become the consumer standard. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:16 am by Eugene Volokh
He wrote: [T]he complaints seemed to be filed in retaliation for doing my due diligence of following up on several residents' complaints. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 2:05 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Skladany: if you’re consuming 10 hours/day, you don’t have time to work—our consumption often occurs at work, but not if you’re a factory worker. [read post]