Search for: "The People v. Chambers" Results 1601 - 1620 of 1,915
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2011, 5:29 am by Russ Bensing
   Back in March, I told you about HB 77, which was written to overcome State v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 9:00 am
As might be expected, the topics covered include patents, standards and competition law, not to mention a smattering of European caselaw involving Apple and IPCom v Nokia. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 3:56 am
 Back on PatLit, David Berry considers liability for "divided" patent infringement -- and how a recent US Court of Appeal for the Federal Circuit decision in BMC v Paymentech has avoided tackling it full-on. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 3:38 pm by Bruce Zagaris
  The next step in the judicial process is to request authorization from the Pre-Trial Chamber to open an investigation into the situation in Ukraine. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 9:04 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
Most historic associations are co-located, as in the typical barrister chambers we still see frequently in criminal practice. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 11:16 am
Rape is a difficult subject that people commonly avoid talking about. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 5:48 am by SHG
The general answer for federal judges comes with a knock on chambers door from the chief. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 10:19 am by Gritsforbreakfast
  The term "Terry frisks" comes from the Supreme Court decision Terry v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 10:10 am by Sandy Levinson
You don't have to articulate an administerable standard any more than you did in Bush v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 3:10 pm by Rick Hills
Again, one need not accept such claims: The evidence linking Serrano v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 8:22 am
And would could be a more appropriate item to catch up on than the Catch-up case itself, ITV Broadcasting & others v TvCatchup. [read post]
25 May 2013, 10:16 am by Rick Hills
My example of a point in the black circle of "preemption" is Judge Silberman's use of Machinist preemption to eliminate President Clinton's executive order on replacement of striking workers in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 3:25 am by Lyle Denniston
  His vote and his opinions created a revolution for gay rights, helped save Roe v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 9:30 pm by Richard Murphy
 As the Supreme Court stressed in Massachusetts v. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 3:38 pm by Bruce Zagaris
  The next step in the judicial process is to request authorization from the Pre-Trial Chamber to open an investigation into the situation in Ukraine. [read post]