Search for: "U. S. v. June" Results 1601 - 1620 of 1,839
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
”[26]  In the Commission’s telling, “[a]s part of the settlement process, the Commission and a defendant negotiate terms,” and “if either party disagrees with terms t [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 7:08 pm by Kurt R. Karst
The PTO’s not-even-specious-argument, citing what certainly appears to us to be absolutely irrelevant case law, such as Novartis AG v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:57 am by INFORRM
In their 1 June 2022 verdict, the jury found that Ms Heard defamed Mr Depp, and awarded him $10 million in compensatory and $5 million in punitive damages. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 3:51 am by Matthias Weller
The CJEU declared it to infringe Article 19 (1) TEU in its judgment of 24 June 2019, C- 619/18 – Commission v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 2:00 am by Stefanie Levine
  The Federal Circuit’s recent holding in Myriad and the Supreme Court’s acceptance of certiorari appeal for Prometheus Labs., Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 2:00 am by Stefanie Levine
  The Federal Circuit’s recent holding in Myriad and the Supreme Court’s acceptance of certiorari appeal for Prometheus Labs., Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
  The conflicts are most acute when one country’s legal prohibitions on producing data in response to surveillance directives cannot be squared with another country’s legal compulsions to do so. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 3:58 am by Peter Mahler
The Court’s Decision In her decision last week in Borriello v Loconte, 2014 NY Slip Op 50241(U) [Sup Ct Kings County, Feb. 24, 2014], Brooklyn Commercial Division Presiding Justice Carolyn E. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 2:31 am by INFORRM
Vox and the BBC covered Twitter’s U-turn. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 3:41 am by Peter Mahler
Justice Dufficy’s ruling in Matter of Kassab v Kasab, 2018 NY Slip Op 50934(U) [Sup Ct Queens County June 11, 2018], comes on the heels of a post-trial decision last year in a related case brought by Nissim in which Justice Dufficy conditionally ordered dissolution of their corporation known as Corner 160 Associates, Inc. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 9:09 pm by Howard Knopf
AUCC’s objection was filed by Glen Bloom, who acted for the law publishers in the CCH v. [read post]