Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 12,650
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2016, 5:41 pm
How, if he becomes president, might the civil war begin, since there will certainly be no Fort Sumter to signal the beginning, and the California vote for secession apparently won't take place until 2019. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
The 1959 case of Bibb v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 2:47 pm
Perry, United States Supreme Court (6/26/13)United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 12:51 pm
But under Section 209(b), the EPA may grant California a waiver from federal preemption to set its own vehicle-emission standards, in recognition of the fact that California was the only state that regulated emissions before the CAA’s enactment, and in recognition of the fact that at the time California in particular suffered from smog and other emissions issues. [read post]
7 Oct 2023, 6:38 am
Now Newsom has quietly signed the repeal of the law after it was headed for an almost certain rejection by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 3:02 pm
(“WildTangent”), in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 3:41 am
A lengthy explanation of reasonable suspicion and suspected forged paper tags is United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 5:06 pm
In Briskin v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 3:38 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California have recently released decisions on labor cases among them: Carr v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 1:52 pm
(Compel Agency Action; Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act) United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 5:33 pm
United States District Court Judge Susan Illston (Northern District of California) denied certification in a suit by security guards alleging, among other things, failure to provide adequate rest breaks and failure to provide adequate wage statements. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 2:37 pm
The full text of the decision can be read by clicking here: HARLICK v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 8:56 pm
In Ortega v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 7:00 am
See National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 3:00 am
United Talent Agency, LLC, et al., 2017 WL 946642 (C.D. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 5:10 am
United States, 406 U.S. 128 (1972), because the banks were under a “duty not to engage in a fraudulent scheme,” and by participating in the transactions with Enron, they had violated that duty. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 7:11 am
[T]his District is ranked 17th in the United States for weighted filings per judge (based on four judges as of March 31, 2017) while the Northern District of California is ranked 23rd based on fourteen judges as of March 31, 2017. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 11:34 am
Because the State of California was attempting to govern in an area reserved exclusively for federal regulation, the Court held that the California law was preempted. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 11:34 am
Because the State of California was attempting to govern in an area reserved exclusively for federal regulation, the Court held that the California law was preempted. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 1:44 pm
Such a head-scratching, impractical rule cannot be reconciled with the United States Supreme Court’s class action decisions in cases such as Wal-Mart v. [read post]
