Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 13,833
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2022, 6:56 am
Hill v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
Hildebrandt (1916), Smiley v. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 1:27 pm
On Thursday, in United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 9:18 am
’” The examining attorney at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) refused to register the proposed mark on the ground the phrase falsely suggests a connection with a person (here Donald Trump) in violation of Lanham Act Section 2(a), and also because this mark violates Section 2(c) of the Lanham Act. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
Hildebrandt (1916), Smiley v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] The New Blacklist: "Metropolitan Opera Says It Will Cut Ties with Pro-Putin Artists"
3 Mar 2022, 10:10 am
"While we believe strongly in the warm friendship and cultural exchange that has long existed between the artists and artistic institutions of Russia and the United States," Mr. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 9:03 pm
In Minor v. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 4:30 pm
Timperio v. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 9:13 am
Save the El Dorado Canal v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 9:40 pm
On Monday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit handed down its Continental v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 9:00 pm
Notable state judicial review under state constitutions in fact predated the Philadelphia Convention and Marbury v. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 4:30 pm
Norway Norway’s industry minister said the government would be unable to stop a transfer of state-owned telecoms operator Telenor’s metadata of 18 million Myanmar customers. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 6:51 pm
Professor Nielson describes two arguments made by the Deputy Solicitor General, arguing on behalf of the United States. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 7:10 am
(“Apple”) appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“CAFC”) from an adverse decision in the District Court for the Central District of California in an infringement suit filed by the California Institute […] The post <i>CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY V. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 6:02 am
The changes in the market for D&O insurance cannot be traced to a single source but are instead the result of a confluence of factors, including: The rise of litigation finance firms; The United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 1:29 pm
The Pueblo (and also the Alabama-Coushatta), by contrast, argue that the reference to “prohibited” activities is a short-hand reference to the Supreme Court’s 1987 decision in California v. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 11:28 am
/California Clean Energy Committee v. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 12:45 pm
But the Central District of California in Yoon v. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 10:49 am
The decision in State v. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 7:19 am
Medtronic v. [read post]
