Search for: "United States v. Doe"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 40,130
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2007, 10:11 pm
"Here are the questions presented in this case:(1) Does exception to sovereign immunity for cases "in which . . . rights in immovable property situated in the United States are in issue," 28 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:46 pm
In my own defense, however, I will note it does not occur to me that I should be able to use the power of the state to shut these irritants up, even if they are, oooh scary, hiss hiss, Big Corporations. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 7:21 am
United States, 493 U.S. 342 (1990) (The admission of acquittal evidence in a subsequent proceeding does not violate the U.S. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:59 pm
The United States, participating as an amicus supporting reversal, takes a middle ground. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 7:09 am
United States: neff-cert-petition.pdf us-waiver-letter.pdf Questions presented: 1. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 7:54 am
Supreme Court's orders list this morning does include certiorari grants as well as denials, and the Court did take up United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 11:58 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 6:48 am
On July 8, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
28 Jul 2005, 10:20 pm
We had previously discussed in this post the First Circuit's opinion in United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 6:57 am
North Carolina State University] I noted last month that a Fourth Circuit panel had handed down a divided decision in Porter v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 9:30 pm
At issue in Christie v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 4:05 am
United States, (ND TX, March 30, 2010), a Texas federal district court held that the Gospel tract does not violate U.S. counterfeiting laws (18 USC 474 and 475) because it neither poses a risk of fraud nor does it pose a risk of facilitating would-be counterfeiters. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 9:27 am
The short answer - it does not apply.In United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 8:40 am
United States v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:14 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Arnzen v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 6:33 am
The opinion in United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 1:43 pm
See United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 8:38 pm
A plurality concluded that a citizen does not have a fundamental right to bring her noncitizen spouse to the United States. 576 U. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 8:53 am
Torres, and the United States as amicus curiae, argue that the states did so. [read post]
6 May 2007, 9:43 am
United States v. [read post]
