Search for: "United States v. Hill" Results 1601 - 1620 of 2,359
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2009, 8:57 am
The United States Supreme Court rejected the appeal of Kevin Cooper, a California death row inmate convicted of killing four people in 1983. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 7:53 am by Adam Chandler
” In The Hill, David Cole, who represented the Humanitarian Law Project in Holder v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
China considered sold ‘within the United States’ for infringement purposes: SEB S.A. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
That goal ultimately came to have bipartisan support in the United States, largely as a result of Selikoff’s advocacy. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 6:56 am
Radda, Deputy Teton County Attorney, Jackson, WY.Issues: Whether the United States Supreme Court's standards with regard to the conditional granting of a development permit as set forth in Nollan v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 2:45 am
  KL Gates has a fine post in its Electronic Discovery Law Blog about a recent case, United Factory Furniture Corp. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 10:08 am
Section 1981 was passed in the Reconstruction era as part of the historic Civil Rights Act of 1866, which declared African-Americans to be citizens of the United States, entitled to a series of rights previously reserved for white men. [read post]
27 May 2014, 1:45 pm by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
In 2012, the state Court of Appeals entertained Constitutional challenges brought by Vermitsky in another case, Filipowski v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:55 am by Marie Louise
Scurmont LLC (Property, intangible)   US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Mar Hill Church – Seattle’s Mars Hill Church in second trademark scrape (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
United States, 740 F.2d 1428, 1440 (8th Cir. 1984); Madsen v. [read post]
12 Dec 2024, 9:05 pm by Tyler Hoguet
EPA and Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 5:35 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  So this brings up two central questions: First, is it true that a Herculean justice, seeking unequivocal “right answers” to the questions posed by the United States Constitution, will feel forced by her oath of office to recognize a strong protection for the “right to keep and bear arms”? [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 10:57 am by Steve Davies
ANALYSIS The cornerstones of plaintiffs’ separation of powers challenge were laid in the mid-19th century when the Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 7:43 am by John Elwood
Our next case is a sequel: Moore v. [read post]