Search for: "United States v. Holder" Results 1601 - 1620 of 4,280
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2016, 2:46 pm by Alex Young
  The court held that the respondents’ conduct negatively affected their fellow unit holders and the condominium corporation and was therefore oppressive and unfairly prejudicial. [read post]
31 May 2016, 2:46 pm by Alex Young
  The court held that the respondents’ conduct negatively affected their fellow unit holders and the condominium corporation and was therefore oppressive and unfairly prejudicial. [read post]
19 May 2016, 1:23 pm by Alex Loomis
Madison stated: “By the constitution of the United States, the president is invested with certain important political powers, in the exercise of which he is to use his own discretion, and is accountable only to his country in his political character and to his own conscience. [read post]
16 May 2016, 12:45 pm by Thompson & Knight LLP
On May 11, 2016, Linn Energy, LLC  and certain of its affiliates (collectively, “Linn Energy” or the “Debtors”) filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas, Victoria Division. [read post]
12 May 2016, 6:14 pm by Jason Rantanen
Samsung, stating: “We are bound by what the statute says, irrespective of policy arguments that may be against it”[xiii]. [read post]
2 May 2016, 11:26 am by Lyle Denniston
  In the United States, its products are sold under the brand name “TENA. [read post]
2 May 2016, 6:21 am by Florian Mueller
It's one of the Solicitor General's tasks to represent the United States in court. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 10:00 pm
John Wiley & Sons, is a dispute over copyrighted textbooks produced overseas but imported to the United States and resold by Kirtsaeng without the publisher's permission. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 5:17 am by Matthew David Brozik
The April 13, 2016, decision from the Second Circuit in Flo & Eddie, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 2:41 pm by Evan Lee
On Tuesday, April 26, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Mathis v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 4:50 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The general rule in the United States is that either there is a carve-out for the committee bringing suit on behalf of the entity, or there potentially is no coverage. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 3:57 pm
 Expressing frustration at two examples - Apple v Kodak and Broadcom v Qualcomm. [read post]