Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 1601 - 1620 of 10,389
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2012, 5:49 pm by INFORRM
That distinguishes us from the United States, United Kingdom, Canada and New Zealand which all have constitutional or rights charter requirements that proposed laws must be considered for their potential impact on free expression. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 12:15 pm by Paul Bost
Battles between brand owners are frequently fought in the United States in two forums:  the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board and federal district court. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:42 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The United States District Court for the SouthernDistrict of Indiana held two bench trials, one on infringementand one on invalidity. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 9:15 am by Conor McEvily
United States, continued to keep Court watchers and commentators busy yesterday. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 3:11 am by SHG
That’s how it is “in the year 2024, in the United States of America, in the State of California, in the City of Los Angeles. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 9:30 am by azatty
June 29, 2011), and State of Florida v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:21 am by Rebecca Tushnet
John operating in the United States, at least three United States groups and a Cuban association share the nonexclusive license to use Plaintiff’s name. [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 10:54 am
In today's Wall Street Journal, Judge Richard Posner laments the fact that the federal courts are available to adjudicate whether the President's chosen methods of fighting the war on terror are consistent with the Constitution and laws of the United States. [read post]
27 May 2011, 1:01 pm by Michael O'Hear
I posted earlier this spring on the Seventh Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 12:15 pm
The Verdict Form in United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 9:03 am by James Hastings
To prevail on a likelihood of confusion claim brought under Trademark Act Section 2(d), a party must first prove that: it owns “a mark registered in the Patent and Trademark Office or a mark or trade name previously used in the United States …and not abandoned…. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 9:03 am by James Hastings
To prevail on a likelihood of confusion claim brought under Trademark Act Section 2(d), a party must first prove that: it owns “a mark registered in the Patent and Trademark Office or a mark or trade name previously used in the United States …and not abandoned…. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 11:17 am by Victoria VanBuren
-trained lawyers familiar with class action litigation, such techniques are unusual in most national courts outside the United States and unprecedented in the investment realm. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 4:41 am by Lindsey A. Zahn
Ram’s Gate Winery, LLC (opposer) filed a notice of opposition against application Serial No. 862692961 before the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]