Search for: "X, Y "
Results 1601 - 1620
of 4,307
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2016, 7:53 am
But, as the Court of Appeal made clear in a decision (X v Y) in 2004, what is “private life” depends on the circumstances, such as whether the conduct is on private premises and, if not, whether it happens in circumstances in which there is a “reasonable expectation of privacy of that kind”.ame result in the UK? [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 6:42 am
b) La intención “difundir como propia, copiando y reproduciendo en todo o en parte una obra “x” propiedad intelectual de un tercero. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 5:59 am
When speaking to a patent attorney, he will then say “I invented a product/process that works like x and is different from the prior art for y reasons. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 2:24 pm
“I can’t tell you I’m opposed to X or Y. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 3:55 pm
As it stands cross examination of social work or other evidence often proceeds along the “well why doesn’t your statement mention / set out / explain X / Y / Z? [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 12:29 pm
One series of cases from the Court of Appeal says X. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
Rather the forensic description in simple words that leave little room for misinterpretation and the acceptance that x does not have to be expressed as similar to y but is simply x. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 11:20 am
And the same is true in your work comp program, you say “well I’m going to implement this program and we are going to save 50% in the first quarter, and we are going to do x, y, and z by implementing these crazy steps and getting everyone on board. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 11:49 am
Monday’s Washington Post featured a PostEverything commentary titled, “I’m an evangelical preacher. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 9:01 am
X is for Xplornet, the satellite-based Internet provider that was the target of numerous net neutrality complaints over its Internet traffic management policies. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 8:58 am
X is for Xplornet, the satellite-based Internet provider that was the target of numerous net neutrality complaints over its Internet traffic management policies. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 8:07 am
As to the PMA device, plaintiff’s only allegations were that defendant failed to comply with the CGMPs – general, open-ended, non-device specific regulations that state that the defendant should adopt some sort of process for doing X, Y, or Z. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 12:05 pm
Now one can certainly argue that people who believe in the freedom to do X should also believe in the freedom to do Y because of this-and-such similarity and because the supposed differences are actually overstated for this-and-such reason. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 3:24 pm
(D) Printers, keyboards, X-Y coordinate input devices and disk storage units which satisfy the conditions of paragraphs (B)(b) and (B)(c) above, are in all cases to be classified as units of heading 8471. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 8:54 am
5) Es posible que de cada tres que se quedan en la modalidad de Retiro Programado exista un porcentaje "x" de pensionistas que se gastarán su plata, ante ello, existen dos escenarios: LEER BIEN, "x porcentaje". [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 1:07 pm
The proposed amendment would create a new section 29 to article X of the Florida Constitution, and states: ARTICLE X, SECTION 29. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 3:27 pm
UPDATE: In what came as a surprise to absolutely no one, this case was all but laughed out of court when it finally came before a judge. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 6:02 am
, la izquierda es un desastre y sin más argumento dicen: ¡mira imbécil lo que está pasando el País “X” o “Z”, se han ido a la mierda, PERO POR SUPUESTO, pero ese destino NO SE DEBE a la ineficacia del sistema SINO AL PODER que lo socaba sin piedad PORQUÉ, para estas personas cuya existencia se puede resumir en la frase del “panzón” LA PLATA LLEGA SOLA, les interesa un “birbiquí… [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
To avoid placing such a handicap upon the freedoms of expression, we hold that if the allegedly [tortious] statements would otherwise be constitutionally protected from the present judgment, they do not forfeit that protection because they were published in the form of a paid advertisement.376 U.S. at 266 (citations and quotation marks omitted).That makes sense, since most litigation over pharmaceutical labeling is, at bottom, a fight over science – both sides’ experts battle over… [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 7:53 am
, contesta la aludida, ¿y eso que? [read post]
