Search for: "Ace v. State"
Results 1621 - 1640
of 1,884
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2010, 8:48 am
Of moment, the Supreme Court rejected the reasoning of a 2003 decision by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, ACS Construction Company v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 4:40 am
Here is the transcript in what we call Lebow(the judge) v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 8:31 pm
PIN ET AL. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 8:29 am
The inquiry is always in two stages, namely computation and distribution;”iv) The House of Lords in White v White [2001] AC 596 and Miller v Miller and McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] 2 AC 618 has given guidance as to the approach and principles to be applied in the exercise of the statutory discretion conferred by the MCA 1973.v) That guidance makes it clear that the court is to have regard to, and apply, the relevant statutory provisions.vi)… [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 8:05 am
Wealands [2007] 2 AC 1). [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 8:57 am
The situation in this case was to be distinguished from the one obtaining in Alconbury Developments Ltd, Re (2003) 2 AC 295 and R (on the application of Holding & Barnes Plc) v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions (2001) UKHL 23, (2003) 2 AC 295, and Bryan v United Kingdom (1995) 21 EHRR 342. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:30 pm
Consider a large forestry company, owning forest land in many states. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:25 am
The United States Supreme Court released a 183 page opinion today in Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 5:34 pm
Recently (1996 through 2009), four or possibly five jaguars have been documented in the United States. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 2:04 pm
The Tenant's Handbook stated that there was a right to exchange properties with another tenant of the same RSL provided that: You both have your local Housing Company's written consent. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 2:04 pm
The Tenant's Handbook stated that there was a right to exchange properties with another tenant of the same RSL provided that: You both have your local Housing Company's written consent. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 5:19 am
While a tie goes to runner in baseball, close calls go to the individual defendants in Section 1983 cases.The case is Cornejo v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 9:34 pm
State Farm Gen. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 7:37 pm
In Peacock v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 8:44 am
In the Detroit News, Laura Berman has a column on the State of Michigan's recent filing of an original action against Illinois. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 9:47 am
That proposition was effectively trumped by Terry Gallivan, Counsel for Islington, who relied on the contrary proposition in Akinbolu v Hackney LBC (1997) 29 HLR 259, 269 as well as that old chestnut R v Sec of State for the Environment ex p Tower Hamlets LBC [1993] QB 632, 643, neither of which had been cited to Collins J. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 9:47 am
That proposition was effectively trumped by Terry Gallivan, Counsel for Islington, who relied on the contrary proposition in Akinbolu v Hackney LBC (1997) 29 HLR 259, 269 as well as that old chestnut R v Sec of State for the Environment ex p Tower Hamlets LBC [1993] QB 632, 643, neither of which had been cited to Collins J. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 6:52 am
Briefly, Bloomberg adds its own commentary on the Court's refusal to hear the Chrysler bankruptcy petition, Indiana State Police Pension Trust v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 9:29 am
In Ricci v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 12:35 am
In AC Ward & Son Ltd v Catlin (Five) Ltd & Ors [2009] EWHC 3122 (Comm), the claimant, AC Ward & Son Limited (AC Ward) was the owner of a warehouse in Essex, which was left unoccupied at weekends. [read post]