Search for: "Admin"
Results 1621 - 1640
of 5,817
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2021, 12:40 pm
A group of hackers were then able to use this vulnerability to identify which Parler users had “ADMIN” privileges. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 9:07 am
Additional evidence demonstrated that as a result of Globokar's improper conduct, plaintiff was retaliated against for objecting to his offensive comments, choosing not to attend workplace prayer meetings, and refusing to fire another employee because of his sexual orientation (see NYC Admin Code § 8-107[7]; Fletcher v The Dakota, Inc., 99 AD3d 43, 51-53 [1st Dept 2012]), and was constructively discharged.The employer raised a First Amendment defense. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 3:32 pm
R(Savage) v LB Hillingdon [2009] EWHC Admin 88 [not on Bailii yet, available on Lawtel]. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 3:32 pm
R(Savage) v LB Hillingdon [2009] EWHC Admin 88 [not on Bailii yet, available on Lawtel]. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 2:49 pm
Shah v Croydon LBC [2013] EWHC 3657 (Admin) [Not on Bailii yet. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 7:03 am
The judge confirmed that the standard of review in this case was irrationality, as set out by Singh J (as he then was) in R(May) v Birmingham CC (2012) EWCA 1399 (Admin). [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 2:49 pm
Shah v Croydon LBC [2013] EWHC 3657 (Admin) [Not on Bailii yet. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 2:22 pm
A Maryland court last week ruled that the government does not need a warrant to force a cell phone provider to disclose more than six months of data on the movements of one of its customers. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 3:22 pm
Notting Hill Genesis, R (On the Application Of) v Camberwell Green Magistrates’ Court (2019) EWHC 1423 (Admin) I missed this at the time – May this year – I think because I was on hiatus. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 11:36 am
Waltham Forest LBC (2016) EWHC 1240 (Admin) at (92). [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 8:05 am
For example, in R (P) v Camden LBC [2004] EWHC 55 (Admin), it was held that an authority’s refusal to provide support under s.21 to a US national who was mentally ill did not breach Article 3 because he was able to obtain the necessary support in the US. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 8:49 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) SL (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 1063 (19 September 2008) US (Nepal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 1057 (10 September 2008) LA (Uganda) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 1055 (10 September 2008) NR (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 1053 (10 September 2008) MQ (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA… [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 2:53 pm
The problem here was the high threshold of evidence set out in R (Unison) v Lord Chancellor [2014] EWHC 218 (Admin), reported at [2014] ICR 498, R (Tabbakh) v Staffordshire and West Midlands Probation Trust [2014] EWCA Civ 827, and the second Unison case, R (Unison) v Lord Chancellor (No. 2) [2014] EWHC 4198 (Admin). [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:44 pm
SL, R (on the application of) v City of Westminster Council [2010] EWHC 3182 (Admin) A rolled up permission and substantive judicial review hearing on the issue of whether the local authority owed a duty under s.21 National Assistance Act 1948 (as amended), with the complication that NASS had accepted a duty to accommodate in the meantime. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 11:07 pm
Very stoked about finally getting to the judicial review part of admin law! [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 10:18 pm
As a tale of vexatious litigants, HM Attorney General v Ford & Anor [2008] EWHC 2066 (Admin) has it all. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 1:01 am
In R (GH) v The Mayor of London [2024] EWHC 1305 (Admin), the claimants, Charedi Orthodox children, sought permission to apply for judicial review of the decision of the Mayor of London to extend his Universal Free School Meals scheme for the academic year 2024-2025 but to continue to confine the scheme to state-funded primary schools. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 11:39 am
Not a post about Christmas shopping, (which is all done, thanks to Amazon) but about delays in lodging appeals against ASBOs and the case of R (Birmingham CC) v Birmingham Crown Court; R (South Gloucestershire DC) v Bristol Crown Court [2009] EWHC 3329 (Admin). [read post]
6 May 2010, 6:44 pm
” View here http://quincylegal.wordpress.com/wp-admin/post.php? [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:44 pm
SL, R (on the application of) v City of Westminster Council [2010] EWHC 3182 (Admin) A rolled up permission and substantive judicial review hearing on the issue of whether the local authority owed a duty under s.21 National Assistance Act 1948 (as amended), with the complication that NASS had accepted a duty to accommodate in the meantime. [read post]
