Search for: "Attorney General v. Superior Court"
Results 1621 - 1640
of 3,267
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2015, 9:46 am
The Massachusetts Appeals Court made a ruling in the recent case of Pagan v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 6:40 am
The court also concluded that its own decision in Gentry v Superior Court has been abrogated by recent U.S. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 7:54 am
Iskanian, No. 14-341, leaving in place the California Supreme Court’s June 23 ruling that representative claims under the state’s Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) cannot be waived in an arbitration agreement. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:54 am
In a recent case, Garden City, GA v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 9:20 am
The attorney general moved to dismiss on the grounds that all but one of the applicants lacked standing to seek a review. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 6:11 am
Superior Court, supra. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Iskanian 14-341Issue: Whether an employee’s waiver in an arbitration agreement of a collective or “representative action” under the California Private Attorneys General Act, Cal. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:08 am
The lawsuit was originally filed in California State Court (Superior Court) but then removed by the defendants to Federal Court on the grounds that the case “related to patents. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 5:41 pm
Guntlow v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 12:32 pm
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal in Portillo v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:22 pm
Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 12:51 pm
Quazzo v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 12:22 pm
Superior Court), given that the earlier trial was in the federal court system (the D.C. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 9:40 am
HereSven tests out the sleepingarrangements ...The case in question is Prosecutor General v CS (Case B-5484-13) and it runs like this. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
Discovery of Attorney-Expert Opinions is Barred In 2014, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's much-anticipated, but short-handed, decision on the issue of whether an attorney's communications with an expert are discoverable was handed down in the form of a 3-3 decision in the case of Barrick v. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
The Supreme Court of Canada finally upped Robinson’s total award from the $2.7 million figure set by the Quebec Court of Appeal, but without restoring it fully to the $5.2 million awarded by Superior Court Judge Claude Auclair in 2009. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
In this case the United States Supreme Court held that a state attorney general action (really brought by contingent fee counsel proceeding in an AG’s name), ostensibly on behalf of all the citizens of a state, did not qualify as a “mass action” under the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”) so as to allow removal to federal court. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 5:12 am
The Attorney General does not dispute this conclusion.Kennedy v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:41 pm
“The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 2:54 am
The general rule in Massachusetts was outlined by the Supreme Judicial Court in Com. v. [read post]
