Search for: "BES v. State"
Results 1621 - 1640
of 68,813
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2015, 8:46 am
The lawfulness of the cap was addressed by the Supreme Court in R (SG & Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2015] UKSC 16. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 7:43 am
But two state courts turned down Mr. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 10:05 am
Co. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:29 pm
Court Finds That State Law Claims Against Online Forum Operator For Misappropriation, Theft, and Tortious Interference Hinge on “Publisher” or “Speaker” Status–Stevo Design, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 2:27 pm
Careful compliance with state statutes and regulations should help avoid being sued in some of these types of lawsuits. [read post]
26 May 2010, 1:40 pm
For purposes of preemption, “it is the activity being regulated rather than the actor who is being regulated that matters …” On May 25, 2010, the Court of Appeals published its opinion in Patterson v Citifinancial Mortgage Corp, No. 287370, affirming the trial court’s decision that plaintiffs’ claims against a national bank regarding mortgage transactions were preempted under federal law. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 1:20 pm
See also Minnesota v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 8:42 am
State v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 9:01 pm
In New Energy Company Co. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
” Whether a digital asset exchange may offer digital assets for secondary trading without those digital assets being registered as securities and operate in the United States without being registered with the US Securities and Exchange Commission as a securities exchange, clearing agency, or broker is being litigated in courts across the country and likely will be litigated for years to come. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
” Whether a digital asset exchange may offer digital assets for secondary trading without those digital assets being registered as securities and operate in the United States without being registered with the US Securities and Exchange Commission as a securities exchange, clearing agency, or broker is being litigated in courts across the country and likely will be litigated for years to come. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
” Whether a digital asset exchange may offer digital assets for secondary trading without those digital assets being registered as securities and operate in the United States without being registered with the US Securities and Exchange Commission as a securities exchange, clearing agency, or broker is being litigated in courts across the country and likely will be litigated for years to come. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
” Whether a digital asset exchange may offer digital assets for secondary trading without those digital assets being registered as securities and operate in the United States without being registered with the US Securities and Exchange Commission as a securities exchange, clearing agency, or broker is being litigated in courts across the country and likely will be litigated for years to come. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
” Whether a digital asset exchange may offer digital assets for secondary trading without those digital assets being registered as securities and operate in the United States without being registered with the US Securities and Exchange Commission as a securities exchange, clearing agency, or broker is being litigated in courts across the country and likely will be litigated for years to come. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
” Whether a digital asset exchange may offer digital assets for secondary trading without those digital assets being registered as securities and operate in the United States without being registered with the US Securities and Exchange Commission as a securities exchange, clearing agency, or broker is being litigated in courts across the country and likely will be litigated for years to come. [read post]
20 May 2022, 4:10 am
The complaint (full text) in Snyder v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 3:42 am
County not required to defend or indemnify an employee being sued if alleged act or omission was not within the scope of the employee’s dutiesRew v County of Niagara, 2010 NY Slip Op 04009, decided on May 7, 2010, Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentPublic Officers Law §17, with respect to State officers and employees and Public Officers Law §18, with respect to officers and employees of political subdivisions of the State, provide for the defense… [read post]
22 May 2009, 7:39 am
JURY INSTRUCTIONUnited States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 11:19 pm
For example, in Freda v Board of Educ. of City of New York, 224 A.D.2d 360, the court ruled that the NYC Police Retirement System could “recoup” over $100,000 of the retirement allowance that had be paid to Freda because the required §211 approval had not been obtained prior to his being reemployed by the New York City Board of Education following his retirement from the New York City Police Department.Such wavers are not required with respect to such reemployments… [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 4:00 am
For example, in Freda v Board of Educ. of City of New York, 224 A.D.2d 360, the court ruled that the NYC Police Retirement System could "recoup" over $100,000 of the retirement allowance that had be paid to Freda because the required §211 approval had not been obtained prior to his being reemployed by the New York City Board of Education following his retirement from the New York City Police Department.Such wavers are not required with respect to such… [read post]
