Search for: "Burns v Burns" Results 1621 - 1640 of 4,517
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2012, 6:09 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Expect to see lots of heaving bosoms, burning stares and masculine tumescence in the courtroom. [read post]
11 May 2010, 12:24 pm by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
(ii) Most of the increase in the concentration of these gases over the last century is due to human activities, especially the burning of fossil fuels and deforestation. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 10:13 am by Dianne Saxe
Israel is burning, in record heat and drought. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 12:50 pm
Amtrak -- a case in which two trespassing teenagers climbed atop a parked train car and suffered serious burns when they got too close to a 12,000-volt catenary wire -- included an unusual provision that called for the trial judge to vacate all of his published opinions and have them removed from Lexis and Westlaw.And it worked.A few months after holding an hourlong oral argument, the 3rd U.S. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 11:35 am by South Florida Lawyers
Sure people are discussing the implications of the recent health care ruling, but the 11th weighs in to address a truly burning question:  Can underage teenagers suing the makers of "Girls Gone Wild" maintain their anonymity throughout trial? [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 11:42 am by Tara Mospan
  The film takes its name from the famous Liebeck v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 12:35 pm
Neuman, The Extraterritorial Constitution After Boumediene v. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 6:41 am
  After the suppression of the Templars by papal edict,  the burning at the stake of many Knights, and centuries of  infamy, the Chinon document  proves that the Templars and Grand Master Jacques de Molay were secretly absolved of heresy by Pope Clement V in 1308. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 1:17 am by John Diekman
Burns & Co., LLC, NY Slip Op 05797 (2d Dept. 2012).Here is the decision. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:26 am by The Legal Blog
 A bench comprising Justice V S Sirpurkar upheld the judgement of Orissa High Court saying that the impugned judgement does not call for any interference from the court. [read post]