Search for: "Carter v. State" Results 1621 - 1640 of 1,729
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2011, 12:03 am by Melina Padron
In the courts: The Queen v Stephen Carter David Beswick Linda Mary Boyd Michael Gillespie-Doyle ??? [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 4:31 am by SHG
The case helped bring an end to the death penalty in New York and was cited by the United States Supreme Court in the 1966 Miranda v. [read post]
16 May 2009, 9:00 pm
But even on the bench, Ginsburg has embraced gender as a source of diversity, and her opinions have challenged male judges for embracing gender-based stereotypes.In United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 5:06 pm by Ben Vernia
”The False Claims Act imposes treble damages and penalties on those who knowingly and falsely claim money from the United States or knowingly fail to pay money owed to the United States. [read post]
7 May 2007, 9:54 am
Dru Stevenson, Special Solicitude for States: Massachusetts v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 1:57 pm
  That approach was also affirmed by the current Supreme Court in the ITW v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:52 am by Rob Robinson
Georgetown Law Rolls Out the ‘Law Firm Pronunciation Guide - bit.ly/KoaqON (Bruce Carton) Global Aerospace Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Frye, The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:37 pm by Ezra Rosser
(Re)Emerging Issues The Seattle/Louisville Decision and the Future of Race-Conscious Programs Philip Tegeler Separate ≠ Equal: Mexican Americans Before Brown v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 9:54 am
Dru Stevenson, Special Solicitude for States: Massachusetts v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 9:41 am
Frye, The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 4:38 pm by Dr. Jillian T. Weiss
It should also be noted that, although the Association initially lost its tax exemption, the State of New Jersey reinstated the Association's exemption from property tax for the beach and the rest of the boardwalk, but stated that it could not continue to exempt the pavilion as it was not truly open to the public. [read post]